Re: Einstein's theory of relativity is 100 years old today - Happy birthday!
- From: PD <thedraperfamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 22, 5:47 am, Albertito <albertito1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:42 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Albertito wrote:
September 21, the 264th day of the year (265th in leap years) in
the Gregorian calendar. There are 101 days remaining until the end
of the year. In this day, one century ago, Albert Einstein published
SR (Annalen der Physik 17: 891),
Today's date: September 21, 2009.
Hmmmmm.... 2009 - 100 = 1909
I often forget the exact day of the week, but I'm yet to be off by 4 goddamn
years.
http://www.pro-physik.de/Phy/pdfs/ger_890_921.pdf
Amazingly, Eisntein didn't provide any references in that
publication, but we know he read Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincaré
works. So, why didn't he cited them? One the most famous quotes of
Einstein reads,
Normally I would point out the standard of literature in 2009 is different
than the standard of 1905, but that would be a wasted breath.
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to
hide your sources"
Today, after one century of nonsenses, Einstein's defecations [*1]
still stinks.
Grow up, kiddo.
[snip rest of idiocy, unread]
Do you know of a crackpot and troll called Juan R.?
He is the most dangerous troll I've ever seen posting
in this forum. He is a kind of Steve Carlip, but
worse. Juan R. has enough mathematical skills to
be able to debunk your, or even mine, derivations/
calculations or theoretical assertions about physics.
In each thread I open, Juan R. just replies with the
typical "nonsense", or with the incorrect "don't true".
He never discusses about the motivations or foundations,
but about the correctness or incorrectness of mathematical
formulations. He is not a theoretical physicist, but a
chemist (not a PhD) with some mathematical skills, that
believes physics must be a mathematical exercise.
Of course, he's bad at Chemistry too, because his
mind is like a computer [input->processing->output].
He lacks of an important stuff for being a good physicist,
it's called creativity. He, as most of other dangerous
Usenet trolls, backs up his naive reasonings on textbooks,
regarded as the Revealed Truth (Revelation). For him, a
mainstream physics theory is always a revealed truth that
can't be falsified but at best just being incorporated to
a more general theory. From his nonsensical point of view,
Geocentrism was never falsified but incorporated to helicentrism
as a subset. I think he is a loser that doesn't dare to publish
his draft about Newtonian limits of GR because that would possibly
cause to him irreparable social and professional damage.
He is a very fearful, hypochondriac person that lives
surrounded of his canonicalscience.com crap.
I love this. Albertito wants people to ignore the consistent
mathematical goofballisms he makes, and yet give credence to what he
thinks are sound motivations or foundations.
In science, the quality of the foundations is judged SOLELY on whether
the quantitative predictions that spring from them match up with
experiment. If the mathematics is sound, and the predictions do not
match with experiment, then the foundations are crap, no matter how
appealing, intuitive, or innovative they are. If the mathematics are
not sound, and no reliable quantitative predictions are produced at
all, then there isn't any basis to judge the foundations at all, and
the idea is dead in the water.
Albertito wants to be rewarded for effort and creativity,
notwithstanding crappy basic skills. A manic schizophrenic who rants
day and night is original, creative, and exerts effort, but this does
not warrant any kind of scientific worth.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: The Emission Theory of Androcles
- Next by Date: Re: Riedt's POR
- Previous by thread: Re: Einstein's theory of relativity is 100 years old today - Happy birthday!
- Next by thread: Re: Einstein's theory of relativity is 100 years old today - Happy birthday!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
