Re: announcement
- From: Stamenin <tasko.s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 17, 12:27 pm, yo <val...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Universidad de Zacatecas (Mexico) jointly with the Nova Science
Publishers (USA) proposes the new publication Project.
2 books in the Series "Relativity,Gravitation, Cosmology" and 13
books
in "Contemporary Fundamental Physics" Series have been published
under
editorship of V. V. Dvoeglazov. We continue with these Series. The
tentative
title of new proposed books are "Einstein and Hilbert: Dark
Matter", "Einstein and Others: Grand Unification".
The suggested topics of the books are: Dark matter/energy and wimp,
Dark
matter/energy and cosmological constant, Torsion, the Ogievetskii-
Polubarinov-Kalb-Ramond fields, SU(3), SU(2)xU(1), SU(5) and O(4,2),
O
(3,2), ADS gauge theories, Majorana-like theories, Spinors,
tensors, and bivectors in the Lounesto classification, Higher
dimensions,
Discrete symmetries (PCT), Space-time symmetries (what would be
beyond the
relativity postulates?), Space-time foam, Quantum gravity based on the
first
principles, Grand Unification, Dilaton gravity, Neutrino and
Gravity,
Photon and Gravity, Spin connection and 4-potentials (Axion, Torsion
and
Notoph), Curvature as a Scalar Field over the Minkowski Space,
Multidimensional Gravity. De Sitter Gravity. Weyl Approach, Parity
Violation, Non-commutative Space-time.
Only papers written with logical and mathematical rigor will be
considered.
However, contributors should be aware that they should shape their
language
so as to be comprehensible to students of physics. In particular, we
hope
that the authors will present new ideas which can open the field of
debate
for free and insightful discussion. The aim of the collections of
essays is also to draw attention to long-lived problems in modern
physics,
which must be solved. All views on the paths of development of
fundamental
physics are considered by us on an equal footing. We kindly invite
you to
contribute to the special issues (books) by sending us your article.
Several
outstanding scientists have already expressed interest to participate
in
the Project.
All papers should be submitted by e-mail to Prof. V. V. Dvoeglazov
(edi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) in the standard LaTeX format
(aipproc.cls is the preferrable format) and as the pdf file. Papers
should
not, in general, exceed 12 printed pages. The deadline for submissions
is
December 30, 2009. The invited papers will be included in the volume,
other
submitted papers will be reviewed by 2-3 independent referees.
Please feel free to distribute this Announcement in your University.
We
dedicate these books to the International Year of Astronomy.
V. V. Dvoeglazov,
The Editor of the Series
Dear Mr, V. V. Dvoeglazov. I am glade to have the occasion to
participate in such an important event dedicated to the International
Year of Astronomy. I am a participant in the discussions of the google
group science-physics-relativity, and I have my group; Galilei-Newton-
group, where are published all mine articles related to Relativity. In
this letter i send only the Introduction showing the quiestions that I
have treted in my group.
The group could be find in:http://groups.google.com/group/galilei-
newton-group
With this occasion I send you only the introduction, saying only the
principal questions that I conssider are very important for the
clarification who is right and who is wrong in the theory the
Relativity. with regards Tashko Stamenin.
1- Introduction
Einstein was proclaimed as the biggest scientific personality of the
20th century and the biggest scientist of the past millennium. He has
discovered the relativity of the time, the relativity of the space,
the law of transformation of the matter in energy and inverse.
Generally speaking he has discovered the special and the general
theory of the relativity. On the other hand the theory of the
relativity by many scientists is criticized as being unreal.
What can be considered as being correct and what as errant in this
theory?
Generally speaking everything is errant and because of that there is
no way to be mended. The intension of this work is to evidence this
affirmation.
There are a lot of wrong assumptions and suppositions which are taken
as basics for the creation of this theory. And the results obtained by
this theory practically are impossible to be verified. In such a way
there is created a situation where are accepted conclusions that
negate the former achievements of scientists as are Copernicus,
Galileo Galilei, and Isaac Newton. The affirmation that the Galilei-
Newton theory is a good approximation of the more general Einstein
theory is a big lie. The reality is the inverse conclusion that the
Einstein special theory is an approximation of the Newton theory and
the General theory contradicts the Galilei-Newton theory. Unhappily
today this theory is largely discussed and criticized by many
scientists trying experimentally to find out evidence about the wrong
conclusions achieved with this theory, which in fact are impossible to
be determined because they are related to phenomena that take place in
infinite distances.
The principal errant assumptions of Einstein theory that I intend to
evidence are the following:
1) The Lorentz transformation.
2) As a consequence of this errant relation is the errant assumption
of the principle of the constancy of the speed of light relative to
the coordinate system from which we see it.
3) The relativity of the distance, of the time, of the mass.
4) The definition of the Galileian coordinate system given by Einstein
is nonsense.
5) The principle of the equivalence of the inertial force with the
gravitational field is errant.
6) The definition of the General principle of the relativity is errant
too.
To my opinion all these things have happened just because some
questions are not explained in classical mechanics and I intend to
give a real explanation:
1) Is not clarified that an absolute system of coordinates and a
relative system of coordinates, as were defined by Newton, are
impossible to be determined, in spite of the fact that they exist,
because the material bodies are moving accordingly to the first law of
the mechanics.
2) Is not clarified that the principle of the relativity, is not a law
of the physics but a rule with which we determine a truth about the
form of the laws of the mechanics in a coordinate inertial system K1
if we know what form they have in a coordinate inertial system K2, and
inverse.
3) Is not clarified that, the principle of the relativity is a
consequence of the law of the conservation of the energy in this case
of the kinetic energy, of the first law of the mechanics and of the
Galilei’s transformation.
4) And the same is not explained properly, why the principle of the
relativity is valid in a coordinate system rigidly attached to the
horizontal plan at the earth’s surface, taking in consideration the
existence of the gravitational forces, of the earth, of the sun, of
the moon and others.
5) As a continuation of the previous point is not explained the role
that play the inertial and the gravitational forces in the
construction of the cosmos in the shape of suns and planets and in the
motion of the planets around the sun, and the solar system around the
center of the galaxy. These forces by annulling their influence upon
the motion of the material bodes at the horizontal surface at the
earth make possible to consider that a coordinate system rigidly
attached to the earth surface can be considered as an approximate real
inertial coordinate system valid for the horizontal plan. And as well
a coordinate system rigidly attached to the centre of the earth and
its coordinates oriented toward the fixed stars can be considered as
an approximate and spatially limited coordinate system in the zone of
influence of the earth gravitation.
As a consequence of this we can conclude that we have two types of
inertial coordinate systems, the ideal systems, as are the Newton’s
absolute and relative coordinate systems and the real coordinate
systems in present of the gravitational forces, which are all of them
spatially limited.
Out of these questions there are a lot of mistakes done by Einstein
and in some way hidden by him, consciously or unconsciously.
All this things have created enormous confusions in physics that some
scientists affirm that a train in an accelerated motion relative to
the earth could be considered as being in a state of staying and the
earth being in an accelerated motion that is a big mistake. Some of
them just affirm that the sun and the stars are evolving around the
earth!
These are the questions about which I like to speak in this work, and
others, and all these things putted together, make clear evidence that
Einstein’s theory of the relativity is a complete false theory, the
special and the general relativity.
Is important to mention that the efforts done by many scientists to
critic Einstein theory are oriented only to evidence that the
principle of the constancy of the speed of light as being incorrect
and not toward the above mentioned inconsistencies and because of that
there aren’t obtained satisfactory results.
Stamenin
.
- References:
- announcement
- From: yo
- announcement
- Prev by Date: Re: outer limits
- Next by Date: Re: The classical model of light fails the Sagnac experiment.
- Previous by thread: announcement
- Next by thread: max internatinal, max wlx, max glx,
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
