Re: Wilson's Theory Of BaTh and WaSh.


"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
news:plcub51dh58be52m161lg3t7c5d4c2t3ni@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:09:49 +0100, "Androcles"
<Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW@..> wrote in message
news:rrctb55tccsm93k9ad69thhk72g7p73egq@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:26:18 +0100, "Androcles"




magnetizing field H. One tesla is equal to 10^4 gauss, and one ampere
per
meter is equal to 4? × 10^-3 oersted.
Nobody talks about the flow or "flux".

I do.
In fact my theory of magnetism says that the lines of force around a bar
magnet
are the same shape as a fan belt being moved between two rollers.

Fan belts go around pulleys or sheaves, conveyor belts go around rollers.
You don't know anything about engineering.
http://tinyurl.com/ycnpxu5

If you want to do the job properly use a v-ribbed belt.
http://tinyurl.com/yd552qc

yes I know aBOUT THEM

Where's the fan, then?



(use fixed pitch)
.>
. .
. .
. .
. .
. O_____________<____________O .
O O

What the *** is that?

It will make sense if you read the fucking instructions and use fixed
pitch.

No way, Anti-Wilson. It's obligatory to ask "What the *** is that?",
you say that to every text sketch I've ever made.
So... What the *** is that?

I still want to know what a 1970's fan belt is all about, used cars
have had electric fans since Vietnam kicked America's arse. Are
your used cars THAT old? No wonder you can't sell 'em.
You should call 'em vintage cars if they have fan belts.



Get it? The O's are spinning rollers that move the belt, which takes on
the
same shape as the lines of force. I reckon some kind of particles are
involved
in magnetism. Different mass dimension though.... so we can't see
'em....


They talk about voltage (electric field), and a current of moving
charges or electrons between anode and cathode electrical poles.
No trouble with a beam of electrons going through nothing, its
a CRT.

What's wrong with that?

Nothing is "wrong" with it, it's just a model. It works fairly well
so it was adopted.

By physicists...

....who refuse to accept magnetic monopoles. You should be calling
them anti-physicists.


They do not talk about moving marges or magtrons between North
and South magnetic poles.

That's because single magnetic poles have never been discovered.

Single electrons have never been discovered. JJ Thompson proposed
them as a model, gave them a name and the idea caught on. It doesn't
mean they exist. They are great as charge carriers, then some dickhead
physicist decided they needed some mass to satisfy his intuition and
now you've got more dickheads saying photons have to have mass
as well. Yet nobody can say what matter is, what element it is made of,
it is "stuff", flubber, mass. If it has mass then it has gravity.

yes we are aware of the problem of separating mass from energy. If
Einstein
hadn't brought physics to a standstill, I'm sure plenty of reearch would
have
been directed towards these bassic problems.

You wouldn't know how to separate mass from force, Anti-Wilson.
E= mc^2 --- Oh my gawd, energy is equivalent to mass!
F= ma --- Oh my gawd, force is equivalent to mass!


You cannot separate the idea of mass from the idea of gravity, the point
from the field.

One of the truest things you've ever said.

The electron is a point with an electric field, the world is a point
with a gravitational field, so the magnetic pole is a point with a
magnetic field.
Then along comes Wilson and trots out the same old sheep's bleat
that we've all heard before: "single magnetic poles have never been
discovered". His thinking is trapped inside the box like everyone else's.

No, there's a basic difference between electric and magnetic type fields.
It
has something to do with divergence. The mathematics is totally different.

One of the vaguest things you've ever mumbled, Anti-Wilson.
Divergence:
http://tinyurl.com/y8jb5jy




It's a better theory than any other I have read about. In fact there
don't
appear to be any other models of individual photons. Relativists think
they are
just point particles.

You are bound to say that, you are prejudiced in favour of Wilson.
Scientist you never were. Your model is total crap based on your
concept of a wave packet that you certainly HAVE heard about.
http://tinyurl.com/ybj3epn

They didn't include mine.

Aww... damaged your ego, did they?



Typical fuckin' egocentric Wilson sees something and then decides
he thought of it first.

I did.
Mine extends to infinity.

And he says others are anti...


.

Quantcast