Re: GP-B Final results



On May 7, 11:02 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 7, 12:13 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On May 7, 3:05 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 6, 11:05 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 4, 3:40 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<<
NASA Headquarters Auditorium
300 E. Street SW
Washington, DC 20546-0001
Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Time: 1:00-2:00 pm EDT

Final Results to be Posted on this Web Pagehttp://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html

Following the NASA press and media event [next] Wednesday,
we will post a summary of the final results on this web page,
including a link to a results summary paper recently accepted
for publication in the journal Physical Review Letters.

As they say on the radio, stay tuned.... >>http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html

=============

Sue...

Yeah, microbes from the moon....http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42932978/ns/technology_and_science-space/

Gravitomagnetism investigations...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov#Attempted_verification

http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9701074

Regards
Ken S. Tucker

Podkletnov is a crank.

I see you have no actual argument, which is not a surprise considering
these results have been around since 2009.

Do the results apply to hyperbolic orbits too?
Ken

What the hell do you think?

Why not just say you don't know?

BTW, everyones phone number is in the value of pi.
Ken

.