# Re: New & Improved Clock announced!!!

*From*: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:47:18 -0700 (PDT)

On May 15, 6:16 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The figure in the article is "4 x 10-19," ,http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110511162528.htm

We could expect to see small variations of altitude being measured.

Another is placing such a clock in a conducting electrically charged

sphere, too vary the rate, or alternatively, fine tune the rate.

That would also provide us with definitive measurements of the effect

of potential on the space-time field, thereby enabling direct tests of

a unified (gravity and electricity) field.

Regards

Ken S. Tucker

Hi Dr. Saam and friends.

On May 23, 8:40 pm, "Richard D. Saam" <rds...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 17, 7:50 pm, "Richard D. Saam" <rds...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>> On 1/16/11 10:59 PM, Ken S. Tucker wrote:> Hi Dr. Saam and all.

A general approach tohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress%E2%80%93energy_tensor

equating QM and GR.

>>E = energy

>>V = volume

>>v = velocity

>>A = area

>>p = momentum

>>t = time

>>p/t = force

>>E = p*v

>>T11 = T22 = T33 = T44 = E/V

>>T12 = T13 = T14 = p/V

>>T23 = T24 = T34 = p/(t A)

>>T12 = T13 = T14 = E/(t A)

>>T32 = T42 = T43 = p/A

>>Tuv = (c4/(8*pi*G)) Guv = p/t Guv

>>G11 = G22 = G33 = G44 = E/V * t/p = v*t/V

>>G12 = G13 = G14 = p/V * t/p = t/V

>>G23 = G24 = G34 = p/(t A) * t/p = 1/A

>>G12 = G13 = G14 = E/(t A) * t/p = v/A

>>G32 = G42 = G43 = p/A * t/p = t/A

>>one then can multiply through by factors of E,V,v,A,p,t

>>resulting in all kinds of interesting dimensional relationships

>>and all dimensionally consistent with Einsteins field equations

>>encompassing (if one wishes)

>>E=hf with h= ergs (energy) x secs (time) dimensionally,

>>also

>>energy = charge(a) x charge(b) / (epsilon*distance (a,b))

>>and with proper variable constructs:

>>consistent with the Work Energy principle

>>A much more interesting and fruitful approach

>>than the 'modern' dimensionless G=1,c=1,h=1 approach

>>which by dimensional definition

>>will not lead to the theory of anything.

>Are their any 'typo's' in the above?

I don't think so.

Conventionally, the T_uv is symmetric, I noted (for example),

T24 and T42 above have differing dimensionality on the R.H.S.

>> one then can multiply through by factors of E,V,v,A,p,t

>> resulting in all kinds of interesting dimensional relationships

>> and all dimensionally consistent with Einsteins field equations

>> encompassing (if one wishes)

>I generally work with tensors, that 'should' encompass dimensionality,

>but one needs to be aware of 'tensor densities'.

This awareness can be extended dimensionally to all types of physical

properties.

>Regards

>Ken S. Tucker

>[snip agreeably]

I worked through some of the Tuv = (c^4/(8*pi*G)) dimensionality

which is presented inhttp://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9905007

pages 38 - 40. May 10, 2011

That's a very nice 'book' you have written.

(I'm on ole dial-up, but it was well worth the wait).

(On pg. 19, above Fig. 2.7.1 is a word "condiction", I don't know

that word (?)).

"G" is apparently a 'dimensionful constant' , I'd to rethink that,

it's been awhile.

The universal constants (c,h,k)

are dimensionally and numerically represented

describing the universe expanding at c in spherical form(R^3)

from the big bang

and increasing universe mass(M)

and decreasing gravity parameter(G)

with increasing universe age(1/H) (such that H/G = constant)

incorporating an internal expanding CPT cellular form of length dimension(B)

and decreasing universe dielectric with increasing universe age(1/H)

with B*universe dielectric = constant

and constant mass(mt) within each cell

and no net charge (e+ = e-)

consistent with a universe density(~H^2/G)

decreasing with universe age(1/H).

This concept would explain

~70% of the universe described as 'dark energy'

Richard D. Saam

Cosmology is another issue, your paper has many Big Bang

details and assumptions.

Cheers

Ken S. Tucker

.

**References**:**New & Improved Clock announced!!!***From:*Ken S. Tucker

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Simple question about SR paradox** - Next by Date:
**Re: Is Eric Gisse Really the World's Dumbest Human?** - Previous by thread:
**New & Improved Clock announced!!!** - Next by thread:
**cheap authentic NFL, MLB,NHL,SOCCERS,NBA 2011 jersey (www.nike-black.com)** - Index(es):