Re: Spooky Action At a Distance Question

From: Peter Shor (peterwshor_at_aol.com)
Date: 07/09/04


Date: 9 Jul 2004 04:49:32 -0400


"Nicolaas Vroom" <nicolaas.vroom@pandora.be> wrote in message news:<DdhFc.172371$iL3.8637564@phobos.telenet-ops.be>...
> "David Park" <djmp@earthlink.net> schreef in bericht
> news:oYXBc.9823$bs4.1308@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> > I'm also a novice also trying to learn these things.
> >
> > On the question of rigidity in special relativity Taylor and Wheeler have
> a
> > wonderful exercise (L-12, p 116, paradox of the skateboard and the grid)
> in
> > their Spacetime Physics text. A meter stick slides across a floor with a
> one
> > meter diameter hole. If the meter stick is moving at a high speed it will
> > appear shortened in the frame of the hole and fall through. But from the
> > perspective of the meter stick, it is the hole that is shortened and so
> one
> > might expect it not to fall through. But it does because 'rigidity' is not
> > an invariant concept. The meter stick 'droops' and slips right through the
> > hole.
>
> Is this the outcome of a real experiment ?
> If No than this whole discussion has no "value" i.e.
> does not make sense
> If Yes what has rigidity to do with this experiment because
> why considering the meter stick (rod) rigid
> when in reality a rod is not rigid ?

This is a thought experiment, and the object of this thought
experiment should be to convince you that special relativity
predicts there's no such thing as a rigid meter stick.

> If the meter stick drops through the hole as the result of an experiment
> (In reality there should be a small bar at the middle of the hole, other
> wise
> a rod which is almost twice as large as the hole with a small speed
> moving left to right over the hole will drop through the hole)
> then there are two points of view,
> one from the frame of hole (and fall through)
> and one from meter stick (and not fall through).
> If the meter stick drops through the hole as the result of an experiment
> than the second point of view is just wrong.
> and not "because 'rigidity' is not an invariant concept"

> Nicolaas Vroom
> http://users.pandora.be/nicvroom/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Spooky Action At a Distance Question
    ... > meter diameter hole. ... > appear shortened in the frame of the hole and fall through. ... But it does because 'rigidity' is not ... > piece of a painting the points would appear to be random. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Spooky Action At a Distance Question
    ... Consider a one "rigid meter stick" ... The meter stick slides over the floor. ... In the frame of meter stick the hole is shortened ... A common example is a meterstick and two gates ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Blower motor died on a 18 year old Furnace: Update.
    ... A clamp meter has two ... >jaws that go together forming a hole. ... The meter will show the amps in that wire ...
    (alt.home.repair)
  • Re: Drilling a BIG hole at 40 deg...
    ... If you blank a round hole first, normal to the sheet's surface, smaller than ... If the drillpress gives you fits, you can do the same thing with the lathe. ... peck drill the hole with a standard hole saw. ... You should expect the last cut or two to be impacted by machine rigidity, ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: Notching Aluminum Tubing
    ... drilling speed, the lack of rigidity, or the hole saw itself. ... are much more rigid than a drill press, and also gotten a ragged cut. ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)