question regarding quant-ph/0312044
From: John Forkosh (john_at_SeeSigForAddress.invalid.com)
Date: 07/19/04
- Next message: Nikolaas Van der Heyden: "T-duality"
- Previous message: Alan: "Re: Black holes produced in colliders"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Jul 2004 04:09:29 -0400
In arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0312044 (Partiality in Physics,
Bob Coecke and Keye Martin), the Scott topology on a partially
ordered set (P,\sqsubseteq) is introduced by Definition 2.3:
U \subseteq P is open iff
(i) U is an upper set:
x \in U and x \sqsubseteq y ==> y \in U
(usually called the Alexandrov condition)
and (which is the subject of my question below)
(ii) U is inaccessible by directed suprema:
For every directed S \subseteq P with supremum \sqcup S,
\sqcup S \in U ==> S \cap U \neq \emptyset
(which is apparently usually called the Scott condition)
I think I intuitively understand the intent of (i), but what's
the intuitive intent of (ii) wrt the Scott topology and, in particular,
wrt the authors' further discussion of "approximation" in Section 2.2?
Thanks,
-- John Forkosh ( mailto: j@f.com where j=john and f=forkosh )
- Next message: Nikolaas Van der Heyden: "T-duality"
- Previous message: Alan: "Re: Black holes produced in colliders"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]