Re: I don't understand EPR
From: Oz (oz_at_farmeroz.port995.com)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: Tommi H?yn?l?nmaa: "Announcement: libhftohoyn1 version 0.11"
- Previous message: BW: "Re: How do photons travel in a straight line in air?"
- In reply to: Creighton Hogg: "Re: I don't understand EPR"
- Next in thread: Creighton Hogg: "Re: I don't understand EPR"
- Reply: Creighton Hogg: "Re: I don't understand EPR"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Jul 2004 06:52:22 -0400
Creighton Hogg <wchogg@hep.wisc.edu> writes
>
>On 27 Jul 2004, Oz wrote:
>>
>> Frank Hellmann <Certhas@gmail.com> writes
>> >
>> >Well a particle is a point really classically. Elementary particles
>> >are not supposed to have any internal structure at all.
>>
>> Well, that's where I have a problem. Clearly electrons do, or they
>> wouldn't diffract.
>
>As far as we know, electrons don't have internal structure. Why do you
>think diffraction would show otherwise?
Of course it depends on what you mean by 'internal' structure.
If you mean its a composite particle, then no.
If you mean its a soliton-like structure in several dimensions, then
yes. Then, as a wave, it can be diffracted. This calls for a soliton-
like object that **isn't** of constant amplitude and extent, quite the
contrary.
-- Oz This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious. BTOPENWORLD address about to cease. DEMON address no longer in use. >>Use oz@farmeroz.port995.com<< ozacoohdb@despammed.com still functions.
- Next message: Tommi H?yn?l?nmaa: "Announcement: libhftohoyn1 version 0.11"
- Previous message: BW: "Re: How do photons travel in a straight line in air?"
- In reply to: Creighton Hogg: "Re: I don't understand EPR"
- Next in thread: Creighton Hogg: "Re: I don't understand EPR"
- Reply: Creighton Hogg: "Re: I don't understand EPR"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]