Re: Order of indices in tensors...
From: Rene Meyer (meyr2_at_web.de)
Date: 08/25/04
- Next message: Urs Schreiber: "Re: categorified Yang-Mills equations"
- Previous message: John Baez: "Re: categorified Yang-Mills equations"
- In reply to: Flip Tomato: "Order of indices in tensors..."
- Next in thread: Danny Ross Lunsford: "Re: Order of indices in tensors..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Aug 2004 09:40:04 -0400
"Flip Tomato" <flipt@stanford.edu> wrote in message news:<cgbmkh$2rv$1@news.Stanford.EDU>...
> What is the significance of the order of indices in a tensor? I understand
> that the convention is for upper indices to sum with lower indices and vice
> versa when the tensor acts on the appropriate object, however, what is the
> significance of having the upper index listed first or the lower index
> listed first (horizontally)?
Hi Flip,
you should distinguish between two aspects:
1) Tensors can be symmetric, antisymmetric or without any symmetry
within their indices. For example, the metric tensor is symmetric, the
Levi-Civita tensor antisymmetric in all indices. Can you write a
tensor without special symmetry? [1]
2) If you are dealing with tensors of order 2, i.e. with two indices,
you can write them down as a matrix, i.e. the metric tensor. Then, the
order of writing of the indices also becomes important when you are
contracting tensors by doing matrix multiplication.
Rene.
[1] T^abc_def = delta^a_d delta^b_e delta^c_f
- delta^a_e delta^b_d delta^c_f
- delta^a_f delta^b_d delta^c_e
- Next message: Urs Schreiber: "Re: categorified Yang-Mills equations"
- Previous message: John Baez: "Re: categorified Yang-Mills equations"
- In reply to: Flip Tomato: "Order of indices in tensors..."
- Next in thread: Danny Ross Lunsford: "Re: Order of indices in tensors..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|