Re: What's wrong with loop quantum gravity

From: Aaron Denney (wnoise_at_ofb.net)
Date: 09/23/04 

Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:46:55 +0000 (UTC)

On 2004-09-22, Lubos Motl <motl@feynman.harvard.edu> wrote:
> It would be a sad outcome, but if we happen to see that a point in the
> "landscape" is the only way how to describe the real world without jumping
> to theories with infinitely many arbitrary parameters, we will have to
> take this possibility seriously.

A point in an high-dimensional "landscape" sounds like just another way
of describing a theory with many arbitrary parameters to me. 

-- 
Aaron Denney
-><-