Re: Magnetic Monopole
From: greywolf42 (mingstb_at_marssim-ss.com)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: James Dolan: "Re: inonu-wigner contraction"
- Previous message: Arnold Neumaier: "Re: Where did the main (anti)commutation relation go?"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Magnetic Monopole"
- Next in thread: Rob Woodside: "Re: Magnetic Monopole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:31:30 +0000 (UTC)
"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:2rjo3nF1bfevoU1@uni-berlin.de...
> How much disruption or inconvenience would mainline physics theories
> suffer if a magnetic monopole were found. GTR would not be impacted.
> What of the quantum type theories?
Why are you asking, Robert? Magnetic monopoles have been looked for
(for philosophical and theoretical reasons), yet none have ever been found.
What use do you see for speculation on what would have to change to
incorporate nonexistent entities?
--
greywolf42
ubi dubium ibi libertas
{remove planet for e-mail}
- Next message: James Dolan: "Re: inonu-wigner contraction"
- Previous message: Arnold Neumaier: "Re: Where did the main (anti)commutation relation go?"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Magnetic Monopole"
- Next in thread: Rob Woodside: "Re: Magnetic Monopole"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
