Re: Question for Lubos.
From: Lubos Motl (motl_at_feynman.harvard.edu)
Date: 10/25/04
- Next message: John T Lowry: "Re: what use of classical mechanics"
- Previous message: ebunn_at_lfa221051.richmond.edu: "Re: Lagrange Points"
- In reply to: Scott: "Question for Lubos."
- Next in thread: Scott: "Re: Question for Lubos."
- Reply: Scott: "Re: Question for Lubos."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:42:14 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Scott wrote:
> I was looking at your paper with Neitzke, hep-th/0301173. I am
> reading 2.4 in the paper and have probably a very basic question. You
> say it is convenient to choose the branch such that n=0. Other than
> convenience, is there some basic reason why this branch is preferred
> over any other branch?
Dear Scott, if I understand your question well, you ask why did we choose
the point r=0, close to our contour, to be mapped to z=0 in the tortoise
coordinate plane.
It's because the number 0 is easy to work with. You can also choose r=0 to
be mapped to z=2.pi.i.n, and the whole argument will be essentially
unchanged. The choice n=0 is not preferred because of any fundamental
reason - it is just a matter of convenience. If you choose a different n,
the only change that you will have to do is to write (z-2.pi.i.n) instead
of z everywhere in the rest of the argument - it is as simple as this
additive shift.
The logarithms in the tortoise coordinate fortunately always appear with a
constant coefficient only - so the convention about the branch is always a
matter of an additive shift, even for more complicated black holes.
Does it answer your question? If I wrote something incorrectly, I believe
that Andy Neitzke will correct me.
All the best,
Lubos
______________________________________________________________________________
E-mail: lumo@matfyz.cz fax: +1-617/496-0110 Web: http://lumo.matfyz.cz/
eFax: +1-801/454-1858 work: +1-617/384-9488 home: +1-617/868-4487 (call)
Webs: http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/ http://motls.blogspot.com/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Next message: John T Lowry: "Re: what use of classical mechanics"
- Previous message: ebunn_at_lfa221051.richmond.edu: "Re: Lagrange Points"
- In reply to: Scott: "Question for Lubos."
- Next in thread: Scott: "Re: Question for Lubos."
- Reply: Scott: "Re: Question for Lubos."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
