Re: FTL by Down-converting
From: seratend (ser_monmail_at_yahoo.fr)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Arnold Neumaier: "Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization"
- Previous message: Patrick Van Esch: "Re: FTL by Down-converting"
- In reply to: Horace Heffner: "FTL by Down-converting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:55:57 +0000 (UTC)
hheffner@mtaonline.net (Horace Heffner) wrote in message news:<hheffner-2510040558170001@dialups-321.palmer.mtaonline.net>...
> FTL by Down-converting
>
>
> Bob will in fact see such an interference pattern provided Alice does not
> put detectors in idler beams R1 and L1.[1] If Alice does place detectors
> in both her beams, then this is equivalent to knowing which path each of
> Bob's photons have traveled, and thus Bob can observe no interference
> pattern.
So you beleave that the 50/50 satistics of Bob photons (|+>,|->) are
simply changed with an action of Alice at the end of the universe?
Seratend
- Next message: Arnold Neumaier: "Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization"
- Previous message: Patrick Van Esch: "Re: FTL by Down-converting"
- In reply to: Horace Heffner: "FTL by Down-converting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|