Re: equivalence between path integral formulation and other QM formulation

From: Cl.Massé (info_at_optinbig.com)
Date: 11/16/04 

Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:18:04 +0000 (UTC)

"L.R." <hephooey@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:231bb620.0411110407.70fbc1f6@posting.google.com...

> By reading some old posts of this group, I learned that there is a
> Stone-von Neumann theorem guarantee the equivalence of Heisenberg
> picture and Schrödinger picture in QM. My question is, if we think
> that path integral is also some kind of picture, is there a theorem
> like Stone-von Neumann that say something about the equivalence
> between PI and other pictures?

Path integral is no more than a revisiting of the way Schödringer
discovered his equation, in the converse direction.

> By the way, anyone know where can I found the pronunciation of those
> great figures' names like von Neumann, Poincare...?

Von Neumann : German [fOn 'nOiman]
Poincaré : French (with an accent) [pwe~ka'Re]
Schrödinger : German [SR2'diN@R]
Heisenberg : German ['haiz@n'bERg]
De Broglie : French [d@ 'bROi]
Bohr : Danish [bO:R]

Transcribed in SAMPA (Speech Assessment Methods Phonetic Alphabet.) 

-- 
~~~~ clmasse on free dot F-country
Liberty, Equality, Profitability.

Relevant Pages