sci.physics.research
By Thread

463 messages sorted by: [ date ]

Starting: 10/30/04
Ending: 11/19/04

• Google SCHOLAR! Uncle Al (11/19/04)
• kinematic/ dynamic josef hader (11/19/04)
• Mass moment of inertia of a general tetrahedron Curtis (11/19/04)
• dark energy,acceleration and redshift alistair (11/19/04)
• NP-complete and harder algorithms Cyce (11/19/04)
• FEM with C/C++ Sensei (11/19/04)
• WWW: New Web Site Dealing with Theoretical Physics(now is under construction) kiarash niknejad (11/19/04)
• Categories in Algebra, Geometry, and Mathematical Physics John Baez (11/19/04)
• Question about Heisenberg spin chain Xi Yin (11/19/04)
• Re: A Question about Symmetry of a Catastrophic Dynamical System Kwok Man Hui (11/19/04)
• Negative mass article in New Scientist mike.james (11/19/04)
• Question about HJ theory Mikey (11/18/04)
• Wanted: Chemical physics/physical chemistry post-doctoral position, UK-based. David E. Belcher (11/17/04)
• [spr] question Sara Abrahamsson (11/17/04)
  • Re: [spr] question Uncle Al (11/19/04)
  • Re: [spr] question about Green Fluorescent Protein Pieter Kuiper (11/19/04)
• nuclear magnetic moments and electric quadrupole moments Allan Adler (11/17/04)
• Fine structure constant value Michel Deby (11/17/04)
  • Re: Fine structure constant value Arnold Neumaier (11/18/04)
• Re: How important is GR in order to calc the precession of Mercury tessel_at_tum.bot (11/17/04)
  • Re: How important is GR in order to calc the precession of Mercury tessel_at_tum.bot (11/17/04)
  • Re: How important is GR in order to calc the precession of Mercury tessel_at_tum.bot (11/17/04)
  • Re: How important is GR in order to calc the precession of Mercury greywolf42 (11/19/04)
  • Re: How important is GR in order to calc the precession of Mercury Nicolaas Vroom (11/19/04)
• Quantum mechanics and operators? Jeremy Price (11/16/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators? Jeremy Price (11/16/04)
    • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators? Hendrik van Hees (11/17/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators? L.R. (11/17/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators? Arnold Neumaier (11/17/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators? Hendrik van Hees (11/17/04)
  • Re: Quantum mechanics and operators? Ilja Schmelzer (11/19/04)
• weyl curvature mark jonathan horn (11/16/04)
• Re: Double Slit variant and Popper Blake Winter (11/16/04)
  • Re: Double Slit variant and Popper Blake Winter (11/16/04)
  • Re: Double Slit variant and Popper Blake Winter (11/19/04)
• Corrected "weight" in GR Jack Sarfatti (11/14/04)
• Boyancy and Gravity! Gremlin (11/14/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity! chris h fleming (11/16/04)
    • Re: Boyancy and Gravity! Ralph Hartley (11/17/04)
    • Re: Boyancy and Gravity! Peter (11/17/04)
    • Re: Boyancy and Gravity! robert j. kolker (11/17/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity! John T Lowry (11/16/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity! CWatters (11/16/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity! Doug Sweetser (11/16/04)
  • Re: Boyancy and Gravity! Richard Saam (11/16/04)
• jornal for speculative research, a new idea Alejandro (11/14/04)
  • Re: jornal for speculative research, a new idea Doug Sweetser (11/16/04)
  • Re: jornal for speculative research, a new idea Cl.Massé (11/16/04)
  • Re: jornal for speculative research, a new idea Binder (11/17/04)
• sources of gravity alistair (11/14/04)
  • Re: sources of gravity carlip-nospam_at_physics.ucdavis.edu (11/16/04)
    • Re: sources of gravity Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply (11/17/04)
    • Re: sources of gravity greywolf42 (11/17/04)
      • Re: sources of gravity Uncle Al (11/18/04)
    • Re: sources of gravity Uncle Al (11/17/04)
    • Re: sources of gravity Kwok Man Hui (11/17/04)
    • Re: sources of gravity alistair (11/17/04)
      • Re: sources of gravity alistair (11/18/04)
      • Re: sources of gravity jdff (11/19/04)
• Is the number of electrons gauge invariant? Very cryptic (11/14/04)
• Double Slit variant Blake Winter (11/12/04)
  • Re: Double Slit variant Blake Winter (11/14/04)
    • Re: Double Slit variant scerir (11/16/04)
      • Re: Double Slit variant Blake Winter (11/17/04)
      • Re: Double Slit variant scerir (11/19/04)
  • Re: Double Slit variant Caroline Thompson (11/14/04)
  • Re: Double Slit variant Thomas Trotter (11/19/04)
• Lyapunov stability GRad (11/12/04)
  • Re: Lyapunov stability Dave Langers (11/14/04)
  • Re: Lyapunov stability Robert Israel (11/14/04)
  • Re: Lyapunov stability Arnold Neumaier (11/14/04)
  • Re: Lyapunov stability Igor Khavkine (11/14/04)
• equivalence between path integral formulation and other QM formulation L.R. (11/12/04)
  • Re: equivalence between path integral formulation and other QM formulation Arnold Neumaier (11/14/04)
    • Re: equivalence between path integral formulation and other QM formulation L.R. (11/16/04)
      • Re: equivalence between path integral formulation and other QM formulation Arnold Neumaier (11/17/04)
      • Re: equivalence between path integral formulation and other QM formulation Chris Oakley (11/17/04)
  • Re: equivalence between path integral formulation and other QM formulation Cl.Massé (11/16/04)
• A Red Flag Question (Revised) Kwok Man Hui (11/12/04)
  • Re: A Red Flag Question (Revised) Doug Sweetser (11/14/04)
• Need Near Field equations problems curiousjohn4 (11/12/04)
  • Re: Need Near Field equations problems Richard Clark (11/14/04)
    • Re: Need Near Field equations problems Frank (11/16/04)
  • Re: Need Near Field equations problems Roy Lewallen (11/14/04)
• Number of degrees of freedom of a quantum theory very_cryptic_at_hotmail.com (11/11/04)
• group theory and spin networks Tlas (11/11/04)
  • Re: group theory and spin networks Igor Khavkine (11/12/04)
• fine structure constant and gravity alistair (11/09/04)
  • Re: fine structure constant and gravity FrediFizzx (11/12/04)
  • Re: fine structure constant and gravity Igor Khavkine (11/12/04)
    • Re: fine structure constant and gravity alistair (11/14/04)
      • Re: fine structure constant and gravity Igor Khavkine (11/16/04)
      • Re: fine structure constant and gravity alistair (11/17/04)
      • Re: fine structure constant and gravity Igor Khavkine (11/18/04)
  • Re: fine structure constant and gravity Alejandro (11/18/04)
• Re Einstein (1905) Absurdities Adrian Mark Armstrong (11/09/04)
  • Re: Re Einstein (1905) Absurdities Sam Wormley (11/12/04)
• Re: short GR question tessel_at_tum.bot (11/09/04)
  • Re: short GR question Blake Winter (11/11/04)
• What is time? Orcinus Orca (11/09/04)
  • Re: What is time? Uncle Al (11/09/04)
  • Re: What is time? Doug Sweetser (11/11/04)
  • Re: What is time? Eugene Shubert (11/11/04)
    • Re: What is time? Orcinus Orca (11/12/04)
      • Re: What is time? Doug Sweetser (11/14/04)
      • Re: What is time? Eugene Shubert (11/14/04)
      • Re: What is time? Y.Porat (11/16/04)
      • Re: What is time? Daniel Elander (11/17/04)
  • Re: What is time? CSharpner (11/11/04)
  • Re: What is time? Svein Ove Aas (11/12/04)
  • Re: What is time? Marcel LeBel (11/19/04)
• Extra diimensions CWatters (11/08/04)
  • Re: Extra diimensions Maurice Barnhill (11/09/04)
    • Re: Extra diimensions CWatters (11/09/04)
    • Re: Extra diimensions scerir (11/11/04)
    • Re: Extra diimensions Igor (11/12/04)
      • Re: Extra diimensions Maurice Barnhill (11/14/04)
• Any Explanation Yet for Apparent Increasing Rate of Expansion of Universe? BretCahill (11/07/04)
  • Re: Any Explanation Yet for Apparent Increasing Rate of Expansion of Universe? Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply (11/08/04)
  • Re: Any Explanation Yet for Apparent Increasing Rate of Expansion of Universe? MP (11/14/04)
    • Re: Any Explanation Yet for Apparent Increasing Rate of Expansion of Universe? CWatters (11/16/04)
      • Re: Any Explanation Yet for Apparent Increasing Rate of Expansion of Universe? MP (11/17/04)
      • Re: Any Explanation Yet for Apparent Increasing Rate of Expansion of Universe? CWatters (11/18/04)
      • Re: Any Explanation Yet for Apparent Increasing Rate of Expansion of Universe? Paddy (11/19/04)
    • Re: Any Explanation Yet for Apparent Increasing Rate of Expansion of Universe? Sergey Ivanenko (11/19/04)
• Photons-atoms interactions Kumar (11/07/04)
  • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Caroline Thompson (11/09/04)
    • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Kumar (11/12/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Caroline Thompson (11/14/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Orcinus Orca (11/16/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Caroline Thompson (11/17/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Igor Khavkine (11/14/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Kumar (11/16/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Igor Khavkine (11/17/04)
  • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Igor Khavkine (11/09/04)
    • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Kumar (11/11/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Igor Khavkine (11/12/04)
  • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Orcinus Orca (11/09/04)
    • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Kumar (11/11/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Orcinus Orca (11/12/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Igor Khavkine (11/14/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Orcinus Orca (11/12/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Kumar (11/14/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Orcinus Orca (11/16/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Kumar (11/18/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Igor Khavkine (11/19/04)
      • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Orcinus Orca (11/19/04)
  • Re: Photons-atoms interactions Oz (11/19/04)
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 208) John Baez (11/07/04)
• Re: Extracting information from quantum spacetime geometry----"Perturbing Kwok Man Hui (11/07/04)
• electron mass in an electrical circuit Dave Cutler (11/05/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Joseph.D.Warner (11/06/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Dave (11/06/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Richard Saam (11/06/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Igor Khavkine (11/06/04)
    • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit robert bristow-johnson (11/07/04)
      • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Dave (11/08/04)
      • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Igor Khavkine (11/08/04)
      • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Bilge (11/09/04)
      • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Mikko Kiviranta (11/09/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Uncle Al (11/07/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Maurice Barnhill (11/07/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit BW (11/07/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Frank Hellmann (11/07/04)
    • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Richard Saam (11/09/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Ian Taylor (11/07/04)
    • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit jdff (11/09/04)
      • Ballistic transport (was Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit) Igor Khavkine (11/12/04)
      • Re: Ballistic transport (was Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit) Douglas Natelson (11/14/04)
      • Re: Ballistic transport (was Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit) Richard Saam (11/17/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit Mikko Kiviranta (11/08/04)
  • Re: electron mass in an electrical circuit andrew.stewart_at_anu.edu.au (11/16/04)
• Background of unification model Doug Sweetser (11/05/04)
  • Re: Background of unification model John Gonsowski (11/07/04)
  • Re: Background of unification model chris.auburn_at_gmail.com (11/19/04)
• Wigner on asymmetry of initial conditions Eckard Blumschein (11/05/04)
• [spr] Re: dimensions P Gralewicz (11/05/04)
• please review: fully classical derivation of Planck's law v. guruprasad (11/05/04)
  • Re: please review: fully classical derivation of Planck's law Gerard Westendorp (11/09/04)
    • Re: please review: fully classical derivation of Planck's law Ivica Kolar (11/12/04)
      • Re: please review: fully classical derivation of Planck's law v. guruprasad (11/14/04)
      • Re: please review: fully classical derivation of Planck's law Ivica Kolar (11/16/04)
      • Re: please review: fully classical derivation of Planck's law Gerard Westendorp (11/16/04)
      • Bugfix revision Re: please review: fully classical derivation of Planck's law v. guruprasad (11/19/04)
      • Re: please review: fully classical derivation of Planck's law Esa A E Peuha (11/17/04)
      • Re: please review: fully classical derivation of Planck's law v. guruprasad (11/18/04)
      • Re: please review: fully classical derivation of Planck's law Gerard Westendorp (11/14/04)
• Smoot's Book: Quadrupoles and Omega=1 Patrick Powers (11/05/04)
  • Re: Smoot's Book: Quadrupoles and Omega=1 Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply (11/06/04)
    • Re: Smoot's Book: Quadrupoles and Omega=1 Patrick Powers (11/12/04)
      • Re: Smoot's Book: Quadrupoles and Omega=1 ebunn_at_lfa221051.richmond.edu (11/14/04)
      • Re: Smoot's Book: Quadrupoles and Omega=1 Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply (11/14/04)
• quantizing a gravitational wave alistair (11/05/04)
  • Re: quantizing a gravitational wave Igor Khavkine (11/05/04)
• A Unified Field Theory Bill Clark (11/05/04)
• Re: Casimir Effect inside a Faraday Cage zigoteau (11/04/04)
  • Re: Casimir Effect inside a Faraday Cage vernonner3voltazim (11/05/04)
    • Re: Casimir Effect inside a Faraday Cage Uncle Al (11/07/04)
    • Re: Casimir Effect inside a Faraday Cage zigoteau (11/07/04)
      • Re: Casimir Effect inside a Faraday Cage vernonner3voltazim (11/08/04)
      • Re: Casimir Effect inside a Faraday Cage zigoteau (11/12/04)
• mathematical structure Blake Winter (11/04/04)
  • Re: mathematical structure Eugene Shubert (11/05/04)
  • Re: mathematical structure Igor Khavkine (11/05/04)
  • Re: mathematical structure Blake Winter (11/06/04)
  • Re: mathematical structure tessel_at_tum.bot (11/08/04)
    • Re: mathematical structure Blake Winter (11/11/04)
• Re: Photons Under Control Caroline Thompson (11/03/04)
  • Re: Photons Under Control N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) (11/04/04)
    • Re: Photons Under Control rge11x (11/05/04)
• Re: Is the universe easy to compute? Chris Pollett (11/03/04)
• Debye-Falkenhagen Effect Wayne (11/03/04)
• pair annihilation alistair (11/03/04)
  • Re: pair annihilation Hendrik van Hees (11/04/04)
    • Re: pair annihilation Jack Tremarco (11/05/04)
  • Re: pair annihilation Igor Khavkine (11/05/04)
  • Re: pair annihilation Arnold Neumaier (11/05/04)
  • Re: pair annihilation John T Lowry (11/05/04)
• The Hodge dual: some definitions & examples Greg Egan (11/03/04)
• reference request v. guruprasad (11/03/04)
  • Re: reference request Arnold Neumaier (11/04/04)
  • Re: reference request Caroline Thompson (11/05/04)
• Re: Virtual Particles FrediFizzx (11/03/04)
  • Re: Virtual Particles Igor Khavkine (11/04/04)
• Re: Purpose of theoretical physics - Was "What's wrong with loop QG" David Golden (11/03/04)
• Re: conundrum regarding propagation of virtual particles Doug Sweetser (11/03/04)
• Re: Multiple Time Dimensions Aaron Bergman (11/03/04)
• Re: Any active physics research fields which do not depend much on experiments p.kinsler_at_imperial.ac.uk (11/03/04)
• Re: Mach's Principle, intertia, and radiation reaction Harry (11/03/04)
  • Re: Mach's Principle, intertia, and radiation reaction tessel_at_tum.bot (11/09/04)
    • Re: Mach's Principle, intertia, and radiation reaction scerir (11/09/04)
• Understanding Perturbation Theory of GR Bill Kavanagh (11/03/04)
  • Re: Understanding Perturbation Theory of GR tessel_at_tum.bot (11/09/04)
• Re: REDSHIFT IN A STABLE UNIVERSE MP (11/03/04)
• Re: Hurricanes and Life Maarten van Reeuwijk (11/03/04)
• Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/03/04)
  • Re: Two EPR questions seratend (11/03/04)
  • Re: Two EPR questions seratend (11/03/04)
  • Re: Two EPR questions Thomas Trotter (11/03/04)
    • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/05/04)
  • Re: Two EPR questions Patrick Van Esch (11/03/04)
    • Re: Two EPR questions Thomas Trotter (11/05/04)
    • Re: Two EPR questions Thomas Trotter (11/07/04)
    • Re: Two EPR questions Oz (11/09/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Thomas Trotter (11/12/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Oz (11/14/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Thomas Trotter (11/16/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Blake Winter (11/12/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Oz (11/14/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/16/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Oz (11/17/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions seratend (11/17/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/19/04)
  • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/03/04)
    • Re: Two EPR questions Thomas Trotter (11/05/04)
    • Re: Two EPR questions seratend (11/12/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/17/04)
  • Re: Two EPR questions Thomas Trotter (11/05/04)
  • Re: Two EPR questions rof_at_maths.tcd.ie (11/05/04)
    • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/12/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions rof_at_maths.tcd.ie (11/16/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/19/04)
  • Re: Two EPR questions Oz (11/07/04)
    • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/11/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions seratend (11/12/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/16/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions seratend (11/17/04)
      • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/18/04)
  • Re: Two EPR questions Oz (11/14/04)
    • Re: Two EPR questions Ilja Schmelzer (11/17/04)
• Re: Another EPR question Thomas Trotter (11/03/04)
  • Re: Another EPR question scerir (11/03/04)
    • Re: Another EPR question Italo Vecchi (11/07/04)
  • Re: Another EPR question Caroline Thompson (11/04/04)
  • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/05/04)
    • Re: Another EPR question Thomas Trotter (11/06/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question scerir (11/09/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Thomas Trotter (11/11/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Caroline Thompson (11/12/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/09/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Thomas Trotter (11/11/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Caroline Thompson (11/12/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/12/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Caroline Thompson (11/14/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/16/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Caroline Thompson (11/17/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/18/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Bilge (11/16/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Caroline Thompson (11/17/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Bilge (11/18/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/18/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Caroline Thompson (11/19/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question scerir (11/19/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ralph Hartley (11/16/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/17/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ralph Hartley (11/19/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Thomas Trotter (11/16/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/17/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Thomas Trotter (11/19/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ralph Hartley (11/11/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Caroline Thompson (11/12/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Bilge (11/14/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/17/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Caroline Thompson (11/19/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Caroline Thompson (11/12/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/17/04)
    • Re: Another EPR question Oz (11/07/04)
      • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/09/04)
  • Re: Another EPR question Oz (11/12/04)
    • Re: Another EPR question Ilja Schmelzer (11/16/04)
• Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (11/03/04)
  • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (11/06/04)
    • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (11/09/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (11/12/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Ken S. Tucker (11/14/04)
  • Re: Gravitomagnetism Oz (11/12/04)
    • Re: Gravitomagnetism Danny Ross Lunsford (11/14/04)
      • Re: Gravitomagnetism Oz (11/19/04)
• New grad student with a question Da_FunkyB (11/03/04)
  • Re: New grad student with a question Chris Oakley (11/05/04)
  • Re: New grad student with a question Uncle Al (11/05/04)
  • Re: New grad student with a question Maurice Barnhill (11/06/04)
• Re: FTL by Down-converting Horace Heffner (11/03/04)
  • Re: FTL by Down-converting Horace Heffner (11/03/04)
• Re: cosmological constant in Planck units ebunn_at_lfa221051.richmond.edu (11/03/04)
  • Re: cosmological constant in Planck units MP (11/03/04)
• Re: Lagrange Points Garth (11/03/04)
  • Re: Lagrange Points Paolo Ulivi (11/03/04)
  • Re: Lagrange Points Litnbimi (11/03/04)
• Re: Earlier or later anuj (11/03/04)
• Re: What's up with the pentaquark? Sam Wormley (11/03/04)
  • Re: What's up with the pentaquark? alistair (11/03/04)
    • Re: What's up with the pentaquark? Bjoern Feuerbacher (11/04/04)
  • Re: What's up with the pentaquark? drnobes_at_gmail.com (11/03/04)
    • Re: What's up with the pentaquark? alistair (11/06/04)
  • Re: What's up with the pentaquark? Hendrik van Hees (11/04/04)
• Re: Stasis field Volker Braun (11/03/04)
  • Re: Stasis field scerir (11/03/04)
• Re: Atomic Level Transitions Arnold Neumaier (11/03/04)
  • Re: Atomic Level Transitions Igor Khavkine (11/03/04)
  • Re: Atomic Level Transitions DW (11/03/04)
• Re: what use of classical mechanics robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
  • Re: what use of classical mechanics V. Guruprasad (11/07/04)
• Re: Can Gravity be proved? robert j. kolker (11/03/04)
  • Re: Can Gravity be proved? Harry (11/04/04)
  • Re: Can Gravity be proved? Bob Day (11/05/04)
• Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Ralph Hartley (11/02/04)
  • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Bruce Zweig (11/03/04)
    • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Jesse Mazer (11/14/04)
      • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Ralph Hartley (11/16/04)
      • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Jesse Mazer (11/17/04)
      • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Ralph Hartley (11/19/04)
      • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Jesse Mazer (11/19/04)
  • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Mike Stay (11/03/04)
  • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Uncle Al (11/03/04)
  • Re: FTL by Down-converting (Revised) Ilja Schmelzer (11/03/04)
• Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/02/04)
  • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Chris Oakley (11/03/04)
    • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/04/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Chris Oakley (11/05/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/06/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Chris Oakley (11/07/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/08/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/06/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Hendrik van Hees (11/07/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/09/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/09/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Hendrik van Hees (11/09/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/12/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/12/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/12/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/14/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/16/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/17/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/16/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/17/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/18/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/19/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/19/04)
    • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/05/04)
  • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/03/04)
  • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/03/04)
    • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/05/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/06/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/09/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/12/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/12/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/14/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/16/04)
  • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/03/04)
  • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/03/04)
    • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/04/04)
  • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/05/04)
    • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/06/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Hendrik van Hees (11/07/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/08/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/09/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/12/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/14/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Arnold Neumaier (11/14/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/16/04)
      • Re: Connes & Marcolli paper on renormalization Eugene Stefanovich (11/09/04)
• Re: mass of bound system Arnold Neumaier (11/02/04)
  • Re: mass of bound system Richard Saam (11/04/04)
    • Re: mass of bound system Arnold Neumaier (11/11/04)
      • Re: mass of bound system Kefka G (11/12/04)
      • Re: mass of bound system Arnold Neumaier (11/14/04)
      • Re: mass of bound system Richard Saam (11/16/04)
• dimensions Thomas Cuny (11/02/04)
  • Re: dimensions Uncle Al (11/05/04)
  • Re: dimensions Dirk Van de moortel (11/05/04)
• black holes collapsing to a singularity alistair (11/02/04)
  • Re: black holes collapsing to a singularity Thomas Cuny (11/03/04)
• Re: Debunking a thought experiment Mark Palenik (11/02/04)
  • Re: Debunking a thought experiment Kefka G (11/02/04)
  • Re: Debunking a thought experiment Mark Palenik (11/02/04)
    • Re: Debunking a thought experiment Kefka G (11/05/04)
• Re: Purpose of theoretical physics - Was "What's wrong with loop Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/02/04)
  • Re: Purpose of theoretical physics - Was "What's wrong with loop Dirk Bruere at Neopax (11/03/04)
  • Re: Purpose of theoretical physics - Was "What's wrong with loop Arnold Neumaier (11/03/04)
• Re: Theory, Model and Law Rahul Jain (11/02/04)
  • Re: Theory, Model and Law Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply (11/03/04)
    • Re: Theory, Model and Law Arnold Neumaier (11/05/04)
      • Re: Theory, Model and Law robert j. kolker (11/06/04)
      • Re: Theory, Model and Law Arnold Neumaier (11/07/04)
      • Re: Theory, Model, Law and Principle Nicolaas Vroom (11/08/04)
      • Re: Theory, Model and Law robert j. kolker (11/09/04)
      • Re: Theory, Model and Law Arnold Neumaier (11/09/04)
  • Re: Theory, Model and Law Arnold Neumaier (11/03/04)
    • Re: Theory, Model and Law Alain Cochard (11/09/04)
      • Re: Theory, Model and Law news user (11/12/04)
      • Re: Theory, Model and Law Arnold Neumaier (11/14/04)
  • Re: Theory, Model and Law Arnold Neumaier (11/03/04)
  • Re: Theory, Model and Law DickT (11/03/04)
    • Re: Theory, Model and Law Arnold Neumaier (11/04/04)
• dark energy and loop quantum gravity alistair (11/02/04)
• Re: Cross product in higher dimensions Paul Victor Birke (11/02/04)
  • Re: Cross product in higher dimensions Igor (11/03/04)
  • Re: Cross product in higher dimensions Paul Victor Birke (11/03/04)
    • Re: Cross product in higher dimensions Aage Andersen (11/05/04)
  • Re: Cross product in higher dimensions Gregory L. Hansen (11/05/04)
• M. W. Evans Thomas Cuny (11/02/04)
• Re: Field theory for continua Van Jacques (11/02/04)
  • Re: Field theory for continua Van Jacques (11/03/04)
  • Re: Field theory for continua Van Jacques (11/03/04)
  • Re: Field theory for continua Van Jacques (11/03/04)
  • Re: Field theory for continua Van Jacques (11/03/04)
  • Re: Field theory for continua Doug Sweetser (11/03/04)
  • Re: Field theory for continua Igor Khavkine (11/04/04)
  • Re: Field theory for continua Van Jacques (11/05/04)
    • Re: Field theory for continua Doug Sweetser (11/06/04)
• Debye-Falkenhagen Effect? Wayne (11/02/04)
• Re: Is spacetime an emergent property? very_cryptic_at_hotmail.com (11/02/04)
• Re: What's so "beautiful" or "elegant" about string theory? Lubos Motl (10/30/04)
  • Re: What's so "beautiful" or "elegant" about string theory? backdoorstudent (11/02/04)
  • Re: What's so "beautiful" or "elegant" about string theory? Doug Sweetser (11/03/04)
    • Re: What's so "beautiful" or "elegant" about string theory? WL (11/07/04)
  • Re: What's so "beautiful" or "elegant" about string theory? John Gonsowski (11/03/04)
  • Re: What's so "beautiful" or "elegant" about string theory? Spud (11/03/04)
  • Re: What's so "beautiful" or "elegant" about string theory? Rahul Jain (11/03/04)
  • Re: What's so "beautiful" or "elegant" about string theory? Gerard Westendorp (11/03/04)
  • Re: What's so "beautiful" or "elegant" about string theory? Doug Sweetser (11/03/04)
  • Re: What's so "beautiful" or "elegant" about string theory? Patrick G (11/07/04)

Last message date: 11/19/04
Archived on: 11/21/04 GMT

463 messages sorted by: [ date ]

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint