Re: What does < a^{\dagger} a > mean exactly?
meyr2_at_web.de
Date: 12/23/04
- Next message: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: When do we need renormalization"
- Previous message: Frank Hellmann (Certhas -at- gmail -dot- com): "Re: Can energy conservation be derived from Newton's motion laws"
- In reply to: Yi-Zen Chu; Yiren Qu: "What does < a^{\dagger} a > mean exactly?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:46:58 +0000 (UTC)
Hi,
when looking at the second formula, that looks like the left side of a
commutator between a^dagger and a, it looks like that
<a^+ a> is just the expectation value and that someone just calculated
< a^+ a> = Tr (rho a^+ a)
At least a^+ a is the number operator for some mode.
Rene.
- Next message: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: When do we need renormalization"
- Previous message: Frank Hellmann (Certhas -at- gmail -dot- com): "Re: Can energy conservation be derived from Newton's motion laws"
- In reply to: Yi-Zen Chu; Yiren Qu: "What does < a^{\dagger} a > mean exactly?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]