Re: Twin Paradox paper available

From: Frank Hellmann (Certhas -at- gmail -dot- com) (Certhas_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/30/05


Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 08:42:33 +0000 (UTC)

Russell Blackadar wrote:
> Yes, in practice; but if we (unphysically) allow infinite
> acceleration, we could reverse the orbit of twin B at the
> exact meeting event, and the ages will stay the same. In
> other words, the twin effect depends not only on acceleration,
> but on the distance between the twins when that acceleration
> occurs. If the distance is zero, the effect is nil.

You could probably actually take that limit physically (think of a
gausian shrinking to a delta distributuion), in the moment of infinite
acceleration you would then have finite ageing. In other words a
discontinuity in the proper time which jumps in the moment of infinite
acceleration.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Stupid Relativity Question
    ... The traveling twin experiences forces. ... Be careful here - the forces of acceleration and the acceleration are ... No - it is the fact that according to the Lorentz transform the distance is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Twin Paradox paper available
    ... > other words, the twin effect depends not only on acceleration, ... If the distance is zero, ... gausian shrinking to a delta distributuion), in the moment of infinite ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: a relative question
    ... relative velocity to the observer. ... frame as the observer could potentially release nearly an infinite ... It's true that gamma ... object at a steady rate, the acceleration ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Hard braking and the Physics of Coming-to-Rest
    ... gradually slow the car. ... point the acceleration changes abruptly from whatever negative value it had ... been at previously to zero. ... change in acceleration and hence an infinite amount of jerk. ...
    (rec.autos.sport.f1)
  • Re: GR THEORY IS NOT EVEN FALSE!
    ... Proper local acceleration of a stationary observer ... remain at rest at the horizon. ... effect at 2m not as "infinite local gravity" but as ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)