Re: Geometric Algebra
From: DRLunsford (antimatter33_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: Jeroen: "Ring Theory"
- Previous message: proton: "Re: Quantum Physics explains Newtons laws of motion"
- Maybe in reply to: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Geometric Algebra"
- Next in thread: Stephen Blake: "Re: Geometric Algebra"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:28:09 +0000 (UTC)
Stephen Blake wrote:
> In my opinion, physicists should steer clear of differential forms
> because it is counter-intuitive to think geometrically in the dual
space.
I have to agree, also on grounds on simplicity. In the context of
physics, forms are always equivalent to totally antisymmetric tensors,
which are simple to interpret and tightly bound to the systems of DEs
in which they appear.
-drl
- Next message: Jeroen: "Ring Theory"
- Previous message: proton: "Re: Quantum Physics explains Newtons laws of motion"
- Maybe in reply to: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Geometric Algebra"
- Next in thread: Stephen Blake: "Re: Geometric Algebra"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|