Re: Ether 2.0
From: Michael65Thompson (michael65thompson_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/04/05
- Next message: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?"
- Previous message: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?"
- Maybe in reply to: Hontas F. Farmer III: "Re: Ether 2.0"
- Next in thread: Hontas F. Farmer III: "Re: Ether 2.0"
- Reply: Hontas F. Farmer III: "Re: Ether 2.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:13:49 +0000 (UTC)
All very interesting, I love this stuff. In terms of what
electromagnetic radiation is (wave, photon particles or simply an
interaction with space-time) do some theories match each other more
than others? Does quantum foam more match wave theory? Does this make
sense? Also, please try to use photon and electromagnetic energy
examples instead of prison. :-) Also, where does gravity fit into all
this? What books provide the best reading on these different theories?
I look forward to your response.
- Next message: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?"
- Previous message: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?"
- Maybe in reply to: Hontas F. Farmer III: "Re: Ether 2.0"
- Next in thread: Hontas F. Farmer III: "Re: Ether 2.0"
- Reply: Hontas F. Farmer III: "Re: Ether 2.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
