Re: Quintessence and Curvature
From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply (helbig_at_astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: rikoshea_at_yahoo.com: "trigonometric vector equation"
- Previous message: Robert C. Helling: "Re: A classical mechanics aperitif"
- In reply to: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Quintessence and Curvature"
- Next in thread: ebunn_at_lfa221051.richmond.edu: "Re: Quintessence and Curvature"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:46:28 +0000 (UTC)
In article <d1mejl$r3g$1@beech.fernuni-hagen.de>, "Ilja Schmelzer"
<Ilja.Schmelzer@FernUni-Hagen.de> writes:
> > Whether we need an inflation term for the early universe depends on
> > whether or not inflation is necessary. While there are no observations
> > which rule out inflation (which is a bit tricky, since there is no
> > single theory of inflation; it's a bit difficult to rule out all the
> > variants), whether or not there are observations which require inflation
> > is still a matter of debate.
>
> Really?
>
> What are the alternative explanations of the large scale anisotropies
> of CMBR?
In and of themselves, anisotropies are just anisotropies, which reflect
the initial conditions. They could be inflation-magnified quantum
fluctuations, but they could have some other source as well (or perhaps
no source, simply being initial conditions).
> These anisotropies look like fluctuations, but fluctuations need a common
> causal origin. But they are far too large to be explained in this way
> without a''(tau)>0 in the early universe, AFAIU.
Back in 1995, John Barrow wrote a paper in the Physical Review D called
"Why the universe is not anisotropic", which concluded "there is no
anisotropy problem for inflation or quantum cosmology to solve". If
he's wrong here, I'd be interested in the counter arguments. I can look
up the exact reference if you can't find it quickly enough.
- Next message: rikoshea_at_yahoo.com: "trigonometric vector equation"
- Previous message: Robert C. Helling: "Re: A classical mechanics aperitif"
- In reply to: Ilja Schmelzer: "Re: Quintessence and Curvature"
- Next in thread: ebunn_at_lfa221051.richmond.edu: "Re: Quintessence and Curvature"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|