Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton
From: Vonny N (vonnyn_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/25/05
- Next message: ebunn_at_lfa221051.richmond.edu: "Re: Quintessence and Curvature"
- Previous message: Sci~Girl: "Re: Learning quantum mechanics at age 14"
- Next in thread: igor_at_bigbang.richmond.edu: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Reply: igor_at_bigbang.richmond.edu: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Reply: Neil Price: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Reply: richard miller: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Reply: Bob Hearn: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Reply: whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:54:41 +0000 (UTC)
What is the relationship between:
1. Newtonian Mechanics
2. Lagrangian Mechanics
3. Hamiltonian Mechanics
Can they be declared to be *rigorously* mathematically equivalent?
Does it suffice to say that they are reformulations of each other,
each well-adapted to a particular class of problems?
If so, can we describe reasonably clearly which type of problems are
more easily represented and/or solved using each version of mechanics?
Finally, is there a book on classical mechanics which treats all three
of these approaches to mechanics, along with their
inter-relationships, with mathematical rigour? (I'm afraid I don't
much like Goldstein's widely cited book).
Vonny N.
- Next message: ebunn_at_lfa221051.richmond.edu: "Re: Quintessence and Curvature"
- Previous message: Sci~Girl: "Re: Learning quantum mechanics at age 14"
- Next in thread: igor_at_bigbang.richmond.edu: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Reply: igor_at_bigbang.richmond.edu: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Reply: Neil Price: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Reply: richard miller: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Reply: Bob Hearn: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Reply: whopkins_at_csd.uwm.edu: "Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]