Re: Renormalization
From: Igor Khavkine (igor.kh_at_gmail.com)
Date: 03/30/05
- Next message: paul valletta: "Re: Black hole evaporation"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: The Biggest Experiments in Science"
- In reply to: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Renormalization"
- Next in thread: lost.and.lonely.physicist_at_gmail.com: "Re: Renormalization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:40:26 +0000 (UTC)
On 2005-03-24, Eugene Stefanovich <eugenev@synopsys.com> wrote:
> Igor Khavkine wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:18:53 +0000, Eugene Stefanovich wrote:
>>
>>>Igor Khavkine wrote:
Regarding finite time calculations:
>>>>The procedure is the same as for standard perturbation theory however,
>>>>the upper limit on the time integrals is kept finite instead of
>>>>infinite.
[...]
> I fail to see how your 8-step procedure is going to work when at each
> step you face infinite linear combinations whose coefficients
> are infinite (in the limit of infinite cutoff). I am sure that these
> infinities would not cancel when you come to step 8.
Have you tried it? Otherwise you should not be so quick to dismiss it.
I don't have time to do this calculation myself. But, if you are
willing, I can tell you exactly what to do.
Igor
- Next message: paul valletta: "Re: Black hole evaporation"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: The Biggest Experiments in Science"
- In reply to: Eugene Stefanovich: "Re: Renormalization"
- Next in thread: lost.and.lonely.physicist_at_gmail.com: "Re: Renormalization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|