Re: use of real numbers in mathematics and physics
- From: Eckard Blumschein <blumschein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 08:41:37 +0000 (UTC)
On 12/2/2004 1:14 PM, Arnold Neumaier wrote:
> Alfred Einstead wrote:
>> baez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (John Baez) wrote:
>> The root of the matter, addressing the subject header itself, is that
>> a real number conveys an infinite amount of information. [...]
>>
>> In quantum physics 1/2 of the problem is already gone, since the
>> p's and q's in nature no longer contain an infinite amount of
>> information when taken together. The pure state then, too, have
>> an inherent fuzziness associated with them.
>
> But whether or not a state is pure, all expectations are exact
> real numbers, with an infinite amount of information.
> And this will be so in any reasonable form of physics.
> Cast out continuity, and you lose physics.
Having pondered a lot about how my ideas on the subject of real numbers
can be agreed with G. Cantor's theory, I have to apologize for my
hopefully not yet too late response supporting you.
Please find my pertaining reasoning at
http://iesk.et.uni-magdeburg.de/~blumsche/M280.html
and do not take it an April joke.
Eckard Blumschein
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: use of real numbers in mathematics and physics
- From: John F
- Re: use of real numbers in mathematics and physics
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Computation
- Next by Date: Re: Neutrino generation from electrons?
- Previous by thread: The outlaw map of physics
- Next by thread: Re: use of real numbers in mathematics and physics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading