Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton
- From: Arnold Neumaier <Arnold.Neumaier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:18:08 +0000 (UTC)
Frank Hellmann wrote:
Yes. One can convert any Hamiltonian system into a Lagrangian system in extended phase space. But one can convert a Lagrangian system into a Hamiltonian one only if d^2L/dq^2 is nonsingular.
That is only correct if you ignore the possibility to work with constraints. Without constraints you can't even handle simple relativistic systems though, so this is usually assumed to be part of the Hamiltonian method. See the appendix of gr-qc/0110034 or Diracs Lecture on QM (Here you'll find the original ideas that allowed GR to be cast into Hamiltonian form).
True. But one would usually refer to this as a 'constrained Hamiltonian system' and not just as a 'Hamiltonian system'.
Constrained Hamiltonian systems and Lagrnaigian systems are almost equivalent. One still needs a constant rank assumtpion to go from a Lagraingian to a Hamiltonian.
Arnold Neumaier
.
- References:
- Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton
- From: Frank Hellmann
- Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton
- Prev by Date: Re: use of real numbers in mathematics and physics
- Next by Date: Re: Renormalization
- Previous by thread: Re: Newton Vs Lagrange Vs Hamilton
- Next by thread: What does Landau mean? (From D. Gross Lecture)
- Index(es):