sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Boundary conditions in lattice QFT, Roman Werpachowski
  • Re: Boundary conditions in lattice QFT, Igor Khavkine
• Statistical Physics, Christophe
• upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength, ensabah6
  • Re: upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength, Uncle Al
  • Re: upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength, Charles Francis
    • Re: upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength, ensabah6
• Diagonality of an Observable Operator, Ali
  • Re: Diagonality of an Observable Operator, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Diagonality of an Observable Operator, Seratend
  • Re: Diagonality of an Observable Operator, Igor Khavkine
• Construction in Hilbert Space, Ali
  • Re: Construction in Hilbert Space, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Construction in Hilbert Space, Igor Khavkine
• Classical Explanation of Stern-Gerlach Experiment, Ali
• A Group-Orient book on Simple Lie Algebras, Squark
  • Re: A Group-Orient book on Simple Lie Algebras, Arnold Neumaier
• Stern-Gerlach Experiment2, Ali
  • Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment2, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment2, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment2, Uncle Al
  • Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment2, Arnold Neumaier
• Stern-Gerlach Experiment, Ali
  • Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment, Uncle Al
  • Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment, Helmut Wabnig
• expansion mechanisms - the inertia story, John McCrone
• questions about UTC time, definitions, leap seconds, and measurement., robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: questions about UTC time, definitions, leap seconds, and measurement., Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: questions about UTC time, definitions, leap seconds, and, robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: questions about UTC time, definitions, leap seconds, and measurement., J. J. Lodder
• A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Mike Helland
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., robert bristow-johnson
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., a student
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Roman Werpachowski
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Igor Khavkine
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ralph Hartley
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Alan
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
• A new theory of Unification?, Rafael Aparicio
  • Fwd: A new theory of Unification?, Rafael Aparicio
  • Re: A new theory of Unification?, markwh04
  • Re: Fwd: A new theory of Unification?, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A new theory of Unification?, Cl.Massé
• length of wavetrain of single photon, Brian A. Koss
  • Re: length of wavetrain of single photon, Uncle Al
    • Re: length of wavetrain of single photon, Ray Tomes
      • Re: length of wavetrain of single photon, Roman Werpachowski
      • Re: length of wavetrain of single photon, mat
  • Re: length of wavetrain of single photon, FrediFizzx
  • Re: length of wavetrain of single photon, HerbieTMac
• holographic rg flows, soroastro2001
• Plasma Simulation Market Survey, David Bruhwiler
• 100 MeV GE Betatron at Schenectady, srp
• On the wave function of the photon, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Hans Aberg
  • Re: On the wave function of the photon, =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
    • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Zigoteau
    • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Zigoteau
• Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, rof
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, rof
      • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Ralph Hartley
    • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Charles Francis
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, bjflanagan
    • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Igor Khavkine
• dose tree-level results in effective potential incorporate loop effects?, beacon
  • Re: dose tree-level results in effective potential incorporate loop effects?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: dose tree-level results in effective potential incorporate loop effects?, Xiao
      • Re: do tree-level results in effective potential incorporate loop effects?, Igor Khavkine
• A classification/list of universality classes?, very_cryptic
• Scientists levitate heavy objects, neutron_p
  • Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects, Uncle Al
  • Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects, ebunn
• Beam-splitter and Uncertainty, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Beam-splitter and Uncertainty, Oliver Jennrich
• please help my confusion about particles and irreps., cyberkatru
  • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Aaron Bergman
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Aaron Bergman
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., markwh04
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Frank Hellmann
    • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
  • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Hans Aberg
• problems in NCG, shishirk
• More on porous media, Alice
• picturing spin, Jeff Lee
  • Re: picturing spin, Souvik
  • Re: picturing spin, FrediFizzx
    • Re: picturing spin, Paul Stowe
• Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle, David Macmanus
  • Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle, Hans Aberg
  • Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle, John T Lowry
  • Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle, markwh04
  • Message not available
    • Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle, Eckard Blumschein
• Experimental HEP Job Rumor Mill has been revived, heprumor
• Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction & simpler definition of normal ordering, markwh04
  • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Alexey Popov
      • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Alexey Popov
  • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Alexey Popov
    • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction, Alexey Popov
• Analog math system discovered in likely place., Ralph E. Frost
• Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down, Jochen Fromm
• Stress tensors, Doug Sweetser
  • Re: Stress tensors, René Meyer
  • Re: Stress tensors, Frank Hellmann
• Classical limit of string theory, Blagoj Petrushev
• Job Posting: Condensed Matter Physicist, mariahPNNL
• Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics, chronon
  • Re: Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics, Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics, Yung
    • Re: Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics, Yung
  • Re: Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics, Zigoteau
  • Re: Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics, Igor Khavkine
• Renormalisation group - what is that...., kakazpl
  • Re: Renormalisation group - what is that...., Arnold Neumaier
• question about force carriers, Jeff Lee
  • Re: question about force carriers, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: question about force carriers, Cl.Massé
    • Re: question about force carriers, ebunn
      • Re: question about force carriers, Blagoj Petrushev
      • Re: question about force carriers, =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
      • Re: question about force carriers, =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
  • Re: question about force carriers, Blagoj Petrushev
• Re: Olbers paradox in Physics FAQ, markwh04
  • Re: Olbers paradox in Physics FAQ, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Olbers paradox in Physics FAQ, markwh04
• Could the Aharanov Bohm effect be a Berry Phase?, Souvik
  • Re: Could the Aharanov Bohm effect be a Berry Phase?, Mikko Kiviranta
• Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?, markwh04
  • Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?, markwh04
      • Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?, Thomas Larsson
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Arnold Neumaier
      • Message not available
      • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Arnold Neumaier
• Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Souvik
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, rof
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, rof
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, rof
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, rof
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, scerir
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, rof
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, markwh04
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Baugh
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Wave Function of the Universe?, Baugh
      • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Frank Hellmann
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Frank Hellmann
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, rof
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Seratend
    • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Seratend
      • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Seratend
    • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Seratend
    • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Seratend
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Seratend
    • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Arnold Neumaier
• Black Holes and Antimatter..., Marc Asturias
  • Re: Black Holes and Antimatter..., FrediFizzx
    • Re: Black Holes and Antimatter..., Dirk Bruere at Neopax
      • Re: Black Holes and Antimatter..., FrediFizzx
  • Re: Black Holes and Antimatter..., Frank Hellmann
    • Re: Black Holes and Antimatter..., Oz
  • Re: Black Holes and Antimatter..., chronon
  • Re: Black Holes and Antimatter..., Frank Hellmann
• Are we made of Fulling-Davies-Unruh radiation?, chri_schiller
• Rotation in N-space, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Rotation in N-space, Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: Rotation in N-space, Igor
    • Re: Rotation in N-space, Gerard Westendorp
      • Re: Rotation in N-space, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Rotation in N-space, Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: Rotation in N-space, Samee Zahur
  • Re: Rotation in N-space, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Rotation in N-space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
  • Re: Rotation in N-space, Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• leptons, pions and QCD SSB, Al . Rivero
  • Re: leptons, pions and QCD SSB, Francis Bursa
    • Re: leptons, pions and QCD SSB, Al . Rivero
      • Re: leptons, pions and QCD SSB, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: leptons, pions and QCD SSB, Al . Rivero
• Final Announcement, Tim Boykett
• Wigner rotations in higher dimensions?, T.D. Gutierrez
• Periodic Boundary Condition, Min Wang
  • Re: Periodic Boundary Condition, m31415
  • Re: Periodic Boundary Condition, Arnold Neumaier
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Greg Egan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Greg Egan
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Greg Egan
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Gerard Westendorp
• WZW term newbie question, gmoutso
  • Re: WZW term newbie question, gmoutso
    • Re: WZW term newbie question, Aaron Bergman
• Professor Soper's mistake., Radi Khrapko
• hole spin, kupfer
  • Re: hole spin, Zigoteau
  • Re: hole spin, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: hole spin, kupfer
      • Re: hole spin, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: hole spin, Douglas Natelson
  • Re: hole spin, Zigoteau
  • Re: hole spin, Igor Khavkine
• Hypercomplex Velocity of Light, R.Aparicio.
  • Re: Hypercomplex Velocity of Light, Uncle Al
    • Chiral photonic crystal, Richard Saam
  • Re: Hypercomplex Velocity of Light, Mark Palenik
    • Re: Hypercomplex Velocity of Light, m31415
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Hypercomplex Velocity of Light, R.Aparicio.
• A book on Clifford Applications, Rafael Aparicio
  • Re: A book on Clifford Applications, Stephen Parrott
  • Re: A book on Clifford Applications, Rafael Aparicio
• space-time visualization (vs. space-space visualization), mot12345
  • Re: space-time visualization (vs. space-space visualization), Igor Khavkine
  • Re: space-time visualization (vs. space-space visualization), Marcel LeBel
  • Re: space-time visualization (vs. space-space visualization), carlip-nospam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: space-time visualization (vs. space-space visualization), tessel
• Re: Spin measurement problem, Hans Aberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Spin measurement problem, Yung
    • Re: Spin measurement problem, Hans Aberg
• Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory, Souvik
  • Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory, Baugh
    • Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory, Alexey Popov
  • Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory, whopkins
  • Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory, Hans Aberg
  • Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory, whopkins
• Podkletnov & superconductors as transducers for grav radiation -suggestion, frank
  • Re: Podkletnov & superconductors as transducers for grav radiation -suggestion, johndevers
  • Re: Podkletnov & superconductors as transducers for grav radiation -suggestion, Quantum Mirror
• Thoughts on the Spin - Statistics Connection, Souvik
• Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, Souvik
  • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, FrediFizzx
    • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, Souvik
      • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, Souvik
      • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, bjflanagan
      • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, Souvik
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Hontas F. Farmer III
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Blagoj Petrushev
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Hontas F. Farmer III
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, rof
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Hontas F. Farmer III
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, thomas_larsson_01
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Souvik
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Hontas F. Farmer III
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, carlip-nospam
  • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, Souvik
    • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, Souvik
      • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, Ilja Schmelzer
    • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, Stephen Paul King
  • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, Souvik
  • Why Should We Quantise Geometry? Experimental Test For Spin+Gravity, whopkins
    • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry? Experimental Test For Spin+Gravity, Souvik
  • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?, bjflanagan
  • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Souvik
  • Quantisation of Gravitational Waves through Angular Momentum -- A Thought Experiment, Souvik
  • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Souvik
    • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Hontas F. Farmer III
• Re: Toodling near lightspeed - NOT!, Uncle Al
  • Re: Toodling near lightspeed - NOT!, Cephalobus_alienus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Toodling near lightspeed - NOT!, J. J. Lodder
• Non photonic description of the Compton effect, Carlos L
  • Re: Non photonic description of the Compton effect, Uncle Al
• Quantum theory from gravity?, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, Zigoteau
    • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, whopkins
      • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, Zigoteau
  • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, LEJ Brouwer
    • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, Zigoteau
      • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, Zigoteau
  • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, Zigoteau
  • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, markwh04
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Quantum theory from gravity?, LEJ Brouwer
    • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: Quantum theory from gravity?, LEJ Brouwer
• One Theory, Thoric
• Re: use of real numbers in mathematics and physics, John Forkosh
• How To Do (Achronal) GR + Quantum Theory ... Without Quantum Gravity, whopkins
• Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors., Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors., dbohara
  • Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors., carlip-nospam
  • Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors., a student
  • Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors., Hontas F. Farmer III
    • Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors., tessel
      • Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors., Hontas F. Farmer III
• Ph. D. studentship in Durham (UK): Theory of Ultracold Molecules, J.M.Hutson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Announcement:: Data Ecologies 05, Tim Boykett
• Re: Quantum Computation, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: Quantum Computation, Nicolaas Vroom
    • Re: Quantum Computation, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Quantum Computation, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Quantum Computation, Nick Maclaren
• [WWW] thesis on heavy ion reactions, Cl.Massé
• Experimental test to verify probabilities, Kanwarpreet Grewal
  • Re: Experimental test to verify probabilities, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: Experimental test to verify probabilities, J. J. Lodder
    • Re: Experimental test to verify probabilities, Kanwarpreet Grewal
  • Re: Experimental test to verify probabilities, Zigoteau
  • Re: Experimental test to verify probabilities, Arkadiusz Jadczyk
• WMAP data for year 2 and later?, Edward C. Jones
• Probe vs. Probed, mark_horn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Probe vs. Probed, mark_horn
• Re: Is Intrinsic Spin Compatible with GR?, Oz
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Is Intrinsic Spin Compatible with GR?, tessel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is Intrinsic Spin Compatible with GR?, himog
  • Re: Is Intrinsic Spin Compatible with GR?, Hans Aberg
• Tidal effects of WIMP-based dark matter on galaxies?, stargene
• Books to read for intuition rather than precision., himog
  • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., mike.james
    • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., richard miller
  • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., FrediFizzx
  • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Spoonfed
    • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Spoonfed
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., I.Vecchi
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., I.Vecchi
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., I.Vecchi
    • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., bjflanagan
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Nick Maclaren
    • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., mike.james
  • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Spoonfed
  • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., himog
    • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., mike.james
  • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Dan Schmidt
  • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., bjflanagan
    • Penrose's nonsense, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, rof
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, rof
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, rof
      • Induction and Quantum Mechanics, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Induction and Quantum Mechanics, Charles Francis
      • Re: Induction and Quantum Mechanics, rof
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Tim Josling
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Charles Francis
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, rof
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Charles Francis
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, rof
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Charles Francis
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, bjflanagan
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, rof
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, bjflanagan
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, bjflanagan
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, rof
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Alf P. Steinbach
  • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Jack . 0Waree
    • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., mike.james
      • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., Ardiani
  • Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., achilleaslazarides
  • Re: Penrose's nonsense, bjflanagan
  • Re: Penrose's nonsense, jcgonsowski
  • Re: Penrose's nonsense, bjflanagan
  • Re: Penrose's nonsense, bjflanagan
    • Re: Penrose's nonsense, rof
  • Re: Penrose's nonsense, markwh04
• Data needed: CMBR Dipole Anisotropy: 6.706 mK, Spoonfed
  • Re: Data needed: CMBR Dipole Anisotropy: 6.706 mK, ebunn
  • Re: Data needed: CMBR Dipole Anisotropy: 6.706 mK, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Data needed: CMBR Dipole Anisotropy: 6.706 mK, Spoonfed
• Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity., alejandro.rivero
  • Re: Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity., Uncle Al
    • Re: Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity., arivero
  • Re: Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity., Arkadiusz Jadczyk
  • Re: Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity., arivero
  • Re: Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity., Al . Rivero
• Re: Kaluza-Klein help needed, Lubos Motl
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, I.Vecchi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
• Re: Difference between PPN parameters and post-Keplerian parameters, tessel
• Re: McDowell-Mansouri gravity, smi123th
  • Re: McDowell-Mansouri gravity, gar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: McDowell-Mansouri gravity, smi123th
• Re: Interacting Morse oscillators., Arnold Neumaier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Interacting Morse oscillators., Igor Khavkine
• Re: Fast Kerr Newmann BH model of the electron, jgraber
  • Re: Fast Kerr Newmann BH model of the electron, tessel
• Re: Pauli Exclusion Principle for Free Electrons, Pierre Asselin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pauli Exclusion Principle for Free Electrons, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Pauli Exclusion Principle for Free Electrons, Baugh
• Re: Braneworlds, carlip-nospam
• Re: Theory of Relativity, Uncle Al
  • Re: Theory of Relativity, Ken S. Tucker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Theory of Relativity, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Theory of Relativity, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
  • Re: Theory of Relativity, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Theory of Relativity, Uncle Al
  • Re: Theory of Relativity, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Theory of Relativity, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Theory of Relativity, Cephalobus_alienus
    • Re: Theory of Relativity, Uncle Al
• Re: Neutron Decay, Electrical Source?, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Neutron Decay, Electrical Source?, FrediFizzx
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Uncle Al
  • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, srp
      • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Andr? Michaud
  • Grav and Inertial Mass, Thomas Larsson
    • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Oz
  • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Thomas Johnson
    • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Uncle Al
  • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Thomas Johnson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Thomas Johnson
      • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Uncle Al
  • Grav and Inertial Mass, Thomas Larsson
    • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Oz
    • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
    • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Grav and Inertial Mass, Nick Maclaren
• Re: Problem / Exercise Books Recommendations, Judy
• Re: Search for free/cheap scintillating crystals, Uncle Al
• Re: Renormalization, Aaron Bergman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Renormalization, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Renormalization, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Renormalization, drnobes
    • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Renormalization, Matthew Nobes
      • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Renormalization, Chris Oakley
      • Re: Renormalization, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Renormalization, Chris Oakley
      • Re: Renormalization, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Renormalization, Chris Oakley
      • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Renormalization, C. M. Heard
      • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Renormalization, Dan Piponi
  • Re: Renormalization, Dan Piponi
    • Re: Renormalization, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Renormalization, jsolomon
    • Re: Renormalization, Chris Oakley
    • Re: Renormalization, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Renormalization, Dan Piponi
    • Re: Renormalization, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Renormalization, jsolomon
    • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Renormalization, Aaron Bergman
    • Re: Renormalization, Chris Oakley
      • Re: Renormalization, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Renormalization, jsolomon
    • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Renormalization, achilleaslazarides
  • Re: Renormalization, Dan Piponi
    • Re: Renormalization, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Renormalization, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
• Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li, Pieter Kuiper
  • Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li, rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li, Pieter Kuiper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li, John Park
    • Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li, Pieter Kuiper
      • Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li, John Park

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint