sci.physics.research

• Thread Index

---

• Re: upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength
  • From: ensabah6
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Alexey Popov
• Re: On the wave function of the photon
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: length of wavetrain of single photon
  • From: mat
• Re: On the wave function of the photon
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment2
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength
  • From: Charles Francis
• Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Diagonality of an Observable Operator
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Construction in Hilbert Space
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Charles Francis
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ed Hanna
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: scerir
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ed Hanna
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ed Hanna
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Boundary conditions in lattice QFT
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: On the wave function of the photon
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Rotation in N-space
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215)
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Induction and Quantum Mechanics
  • From: rof
• Boundary conditions in lattice QFT
  • From: Roman Werpachowski
• Re: Diagonality of an Observable Operator
  • From: Seratend
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Statistical Physics
  • From: Christophe
• Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Construction in Hilbert Space
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Diagonality of an Observable Operator
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength
  • From: ensabah6
• Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Induction and Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Charles Francis
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: rof
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Diagonality of an Observable Operator
  • From: Ali
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ed Hanna
• Re: Rotation in N-space
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: questions about UTC time, definitions, leap seconds, and measurement.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment2
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: A Group-Orient book on Simple Lie Algebras
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: questions about UTC time, definitions, leap seconds, and
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Alan
• Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind
  • From: bjflanagan
• Re: length of wavetrain of single photon
  • From: Roman Werpachowski
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Seratend
• Construction in Hilbert Space
  • From: Ali
• Classical Explanation of Stern-Gerlach Experiment
  • From: Ali
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Alf P. Steinbach
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind
  • From: Charles Francis
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: rof
• Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment2
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Roman Werpachowski
• Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment2
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ed Hanna
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ed Hanna
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ed Hanna
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• A Group-Orient book on Simple Lie Algebras
  • From: Squark
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Stern-Gerlach Experiment2
  • From: Ali
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ed Hanna
• Stern-Gerlach Experiment
  • From: Ali
• Re: questions about UTC time, definitions, leap seconds, and measurement.
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: A new theory of Unification?
  • From: Cl.Massé
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: On the wave function of the photon
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Fwd: A new theory of Unification?
  • From: Ed Hanna
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Alexey Popov
• Re: length of wavetrain of single photon
  • From: Ray Tomes
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215)
  • From: Greg Egan
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• expansion mechanisms - the inertia story
  • From: John McCrone
• Re: length of wavetrain of single photon
  • From: HerbieTMac
• Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: length of wavetrain of single photon
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Rotation in N-space
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: A new theory of Unification?
  • From: markwh04
• Induction and Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: a student
• questions about UTC time, definitions, leap seconds, and measurement.
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind
  • From: rof
• Re: A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Mike Helland
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• A question of discrete space-time.
  • From: Ed Hanna
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: length of wavetrain of single photon
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• A new theory of Unification?
  • From: Rafael Aparicio
• length of wavetrain of single photon
  • From: Brian A. Koss
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: On the wave function of the photon
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: rof
• Fwd: A new theory of Unification?
  • From: Rafael Aparicio
• Re: Olbers paradox in Physics FAQ
  • From: markwh04
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• holographic rg flows
  • From: soroastro2001
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Charles Francis
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects
  • From: ebunn
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Hans Aberg
• Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Beam-splitter and Uncertainty
  • From: Oliver Jennrich
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: On the wave function of the photon
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: On the wave function of the photon
  • From: =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: On the wave function of the photon
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Plasma Simulation Market Survey
  • From: David Bruhwiler
• 100 MeV GE Betatron at Schenectady
  • From: srp
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: On the wave function of the photon
  • From: Hans Aberg
• Re: On the wave function of the photon
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• On the wave function of the photon
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: do tree-level results in effective potential incorporate loop effects?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: rof
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Alexey Popov
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: dose tree-level results in effective potential incorporate loop effects?
  • From: Xiao
• Why physicists should pay attention to the mind
  • From: rof
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: dose tree-level results in effective potential incorporate loop effects?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Frank Hellmann
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: rof
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• dose tree-level results in effective potential incorporate loop effects?
  • From: beacon
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Seratend
• A classification/list of universality classes?
  • From: very_cryptic
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: rof
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: rof
• Re: picturing spin
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Scientists levitate heavy objects
  • From: neutron_p
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Seratend
• Beam-splitter and Uncertainty
  • From: frisbieinstein
• please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
  • From: cyberkatru
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215)
  • From: Greg Egan
• Re: leptons, pions and QCD SSB
  • From: Al . Rivero
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Frank Hellmann
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Frank Hellmann
• Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: rof
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: question about force carriers
  • From: =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
• Re: question about force carriers
  • From: =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: question about force carriers
  • From: Blagoj Petrushev
• Wave Function of the Universe?
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: rof
• Re: picturing spin
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Alexey Popov
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Seratend
• Re: Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Charles Francis
• Re: picturing spin
  • From: Souvik
• Re: question about force carriers
  • From: Blagoj Petrushev
• Re: hole spin
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Tim Josling
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• problems in NCG
  • From: shishirk
• Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: bjflanagan
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: bjflanagan
• Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle
  • From: John T Lowry
• Re: question about force carriers
  • From: ebunn
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• More on porous media
  • From: Alice
• Re: Normal ordering and VEV subtraction & simpler definition of normal ordering
  • From: markwh04
• Re: leptons, pions and QCD SSB
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics
  • From: Yung
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: bjflanagan
• Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Hans Aberg
• Re: Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: leptons, pions and QCD SSB
  • From: Al . Rivero
• Re: Olbers paradox in Physics FAQ
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: question about force carriers
  • From: Cl.Massé
• Re: Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: rof
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: rof
• Re: Stress tensors
  • From: Frank Hellmann
• Re: Stress tensors
  • From: René Meyer
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: jcgonsowski
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: bjflanagan
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Renormalisation group - what is that....
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
  • From: Thomas Larsson
• Re: hole spin
  • From: Douglas Natelson
• picturing spin
  • From: Jeff Lee
• Hilbert space and Uncertainty Principle
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: hole spin
  • From: Zigoteau
• Experimental HEP Job Rumor Mill has been revived
  • From: heprumor
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Black Holes and Antimatter...
  • From: Frank Hellmann
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: rof
• Re: Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity.
  • From: Al . Rivero
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Hontas F. Farmer III
• Re: leptons, pions and QCD SSB
  • From: Francis Bursa
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Normal ordering and VEV subtraction
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Chiral photonic crystal
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Rotation in N-space
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Black Holes and Antimatter...
  • From: chronon
• Re: Rotation in N-space
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics
  • From: Yung
• Analog math system discovered in likely place.
  • From: Ralph E. Frost
• Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down
  • From: Jochen Fromm
• Stress tensors
  • From: Doug Sweetser
• Classical limit of string theory
  • From: Blagoj Petrushev
• Re: Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Job Posting: Condensed Matter Physicist
  • From: mariahPNNL
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: question about force carriers
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Modelling the 2nd law of thermodynamics
  • From: chronon
• Renormalisation group - what is that....
  • From: kakazpl
• question about force carriers
  • From: Jeff Lee
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: bjflanagan
• Re: Could the Aharanov Bohm effect be a Berry Phase?
  • From: Mikko Kiviranta
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: rof
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: Black Holes and Antimatter...
  • From: Oz
• Re: hole spin
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: hole spin
  • From: kupfer
• Re: Olbers paradox in Physics FAQ
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Hontas F. Farmer III
• Re: Black Holes and Antimatter...
  • From: Frank Hellmann
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Black Holes and Antimatter...
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Rotation in N-space
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Re: Black Holes and Antimatter...
  • From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Hontas F. Farmer III
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Black Holes and Antimatter...
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Rotation in N-space
  • From: Samee Zahur
• Could the Aharanov Bohm effect be a Berry Phase?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Rotation in N-space
  • From: Igor
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Rotation in N-space
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Quantisation of Gravitational Waves through Angular Momentum -- A Thought Experiment
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Souvik
• Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Hontas F. Farmer III
• Black Holes and Antimatter...
  • From: Marc Asturias
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: bjflanagan
• Re: WZW term newbie question
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Are we made of Fulling-Davies-Unruh radiation?
  • From: chri_schiller
• Rotation in N-space
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Hontas F. Farmer III
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: rof
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: bjflanagan
• leptons, pions and QCD SSB
  • From: Al . Rivero
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
• Re: Periodic Boundary Condition
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Penrose's nonsense
  • From: rof
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: WZW term newbie question
  • From: gmoutso
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Blagoj Petrushev
• Re: Hypercomplex Velocity of Light
  • From: m31415
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Periodic Boundary Condition
  • From: m31415
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Spin measurement problem
  • From: Hans Aberg
• Re: A book on Clifford Applications
  • From: Rafael Aparicio
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
  • From: Hontas F. Farmer III
• Final Announcement
  • From: Tim Boykett
• Re: hole spin
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Hypercomplex Velocity of Light
  • From: Mark Palenik
• Re: A book on Clifford Applications
  • From: Stephen Parrott
• Wigner rotations in higher dimensions?
  • From: T.D. Gutierrez
• Periodic Boundary Condition
  • From: Min Wang
• Hypercomplex Velocity of Light
  • From: R.Aparicio.
• Re: Podkletnov & superconductors as transducers for grav radiation -suggestion
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215)
  • From: Greg Egan
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: achilleaslazarides
• Re: hole spin
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: Stephen Paul King
• Penrose's nonsense
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• WZW term newbie question
  • From: gmoutso
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors.
  • From: Hontas F. Farmer III
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Ardiani
• Professor Soper's mistake.
  • From: Radi Khrapko
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry? Experimental Test For Spin+Gravity
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors.
  • From: tessel
• hole spin
  • From: kupfer
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: mike.james
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Hypercomplex Velocity of Light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Jack . 0Waree
• Re: Is Intrinsic Spin Compatible with GR?
  • From: tessel
• Re: Podkletnov & superconductors as transducers for grav radiation -suggestion
  • From: johndevers
• Re: space-time visualization (vs. space-space visualization)
  • From: tessel
• Why Should We Quantise Geometry? Experimental Test For Spin+Gravity
  • From: whopkins
• Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory
  • From: whopkins
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Dan Piponi
• Re: space-time visualization (vs. space-space visualization)
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Spin measurement problem
  • From: Yung
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Chris Oakley
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: achilleaslazarides
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: bjflanagan
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Dan Schmidt
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: whopkins
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: bjflanagan
• Hypercomplex Velocity of Light
  • From: R.Aparicio.
• A book on Clifford Applications
  • From: Rafael Aparicio
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Quantum Computation
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: space-time visualization (vs. space-space visualization)
  • From: Marcel LeBel
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: mike.james
• Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• Re: space-time visualization (vs. space-space visualization)
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Quantum Computation
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors.
  • From: Hontas F. Farmer III
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Chris Oakley
• Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory
  • From: Hans Aberg
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: jsolomon
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: jsolomon
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: himog
• space-time visualization (vs. space-space visualization)
  • From: mot12345
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory
  • From: whopkins
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory
  • From: Alexey Popov
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li
  • From: John Park
• Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li
  • From: Pieter Kuiper
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: mike.james
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Toodling near lightspeed - NOT!
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li
  • From: John Park
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li
  • From: Pieter Kuiper
• Re: Non photonic description of the Compton effect
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Spin measurement problem
  • From: Hans Aberg
• Re: Is Intrinsic Spin Compatible with GR?
  • From: Hans Aberg
• Formulation of General Relativity as a Yang-Mills Theory
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Podkletnov & superconductors as transducers for grav radiation -suggestion
  • From: frank
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Experimental test to verify probabilities
  • From: Arkadiusz Jadczyk
• Re: Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Thoughts on the Spin - Statistics Connection
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Toodling near lightspeed - NOT!
  • From: Cephalobus_alienus
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: bjflanagan
• Why Should We Quantise Geometry?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Experimental test to verify probabilities
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Toodling near lightspeed - NOT!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Cephalobus_alienus
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Non photonic description of the Compton effect
  • From: Carlos L
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Dan Piponi
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Quantum Computation
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Quantum theory from gravity?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li
  • From: rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
• One Theory
  • From: Thoric
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Andr? Michaud
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
• Re: Experimental test to verify probabilities
  • From: Kanwarpreet Grewal
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Pauli Exclusion Principle for Free Electrons
  • From: Baugh
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity.
  • From: arivero
• Re: use of real numbers in mathematics and physics
  • From: John Forkosh
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
• Re: Quantum Computation
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors.
  • From: a student
• How To Do (Achronal) GR + Quantum Theory ... Without Quantum Gravity
  • From: whopkins
• Re: Data needed: CMBR Dipole Anisotropy: 6.706 mK
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: richard miller
• Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors.
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Chris Oakley
• Re: Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors.
  • From: dbohara
• Re: Experimental test to verify probabilities
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity.
  • From: arivero
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: mike.james
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Oz
• Re: Is Intrinsic Spin Compatible with GR?
  • From: himog
• Physics JOBS for those with "only" a Bachelors.
  • From: Hontas F. Farmer III
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Ph. D. studentship in Durham (UK): Theory of Ultracold Molecules
  • From: J.M.Hutson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: jsolomon
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Announcement:: Data Ecologies 05
  • From: Tim Boykett
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Thomas Larsson
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Chris Oakley
• Re: Experimental test to verify probabilities
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Quantum Computation
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: McDowell-Mansouri gravity
  • From: gar
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Dan Piponi
• Probe vs. Probed
  • From: mark_horn
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Data needed: CMBR Dipole Anisotropy: 6.706 mK
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Chris Oakley
• [WWW] thesis on heavy ion reactions
  • From: Cl.Massé
• Experimental test to verify probabilities
  • From: Kanwarpreet Grewal
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity.
  • From: Arkadiusz Jadczyk
• Re: Data needed: CMBR Dipole Anisotropy: 6.706 mK
  • From: ebunn
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Dan Piponi
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• WMAP data for year 2 and later?
  • From: Edward C. Jones
• Probe vs. Probed
  • From: mark_horn
• Re: Is Intrinsic Spin Compatible with GR?
  • From: Oz
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Oz
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Tidal effects of WIMP-based dark matter on galaxies?
  • From: stargene
• Books to read for intuition rather than precision.
  • From: himog
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Matthew Nobes
• Re: McDowell-Mansouri gravity
  • From: smi123th
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Data needed: CMBR Dipole Anisotropy: 6.706 mK
  • From: Spoonfed
• Weyl-Dirac equations, explicit violation of parity.
  • From: alejandro.rivero
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Kaluza-Klein help needed
  • From: Lubos Motl
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Pauli Exclusion Principle for Free Electrons
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: srp
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Difference between PPN parameters and post-Keplerian parameters
  • From: tessel
• Re: Fast Kerr Newmann BH model of the electron
  • From: tessel
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: McDowell-Mansouri gravity
  • From: smi123th
• Re: Interacting Morse oscillators.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Thomas Larsson
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Interacting Morse oscillators.
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Fast Kerr Newmann BH model of the electron
  • From: jgraber
• Re: Pauli Exclusion Principle for Free Electrons
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: Braneworlds
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Neutron Decay, Electrical Source?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Theory of Relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neutron Decay, Electrical Source?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Grav and Inertial Mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Problem / Exercise Books Recommendations
  • From: Judy
• Re: Search for free/cheap scintillating crystals
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: drnobes
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Renormalization
  • From: Aaron Bergman
• Re: Hyperfine splitting in doubly excited Li
  • From: Pieter Kuiper

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(11)