Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- From: markwh04@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 07:05:35 +0000 (UTC)
Wigner's classification of particles systems as irreducible
representations of the Poincare' group doesn't apply to charged
particles. The more general notion of particle classes in the presence
of long-range forces is that of an "infraparticle". Correspondingly,
there is a host of literature on trying to combine Wigner +
infraparticle classifications.
But the first question that comes to mind is: why bother with all this
effort, isn't the problem ALREADY handled by the same techniques? In
particular, the symmetry group for a Yang-Mills field is the product of
the local gauge group and the Poincare' group. So, shouldn't a Wigner
classification on (U(1)xPoincare') suffice to give you the desired
results for a long-range U(1) force?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- From: Thomas Larsson
- Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- Prev by Date: Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- Next by Date: Re: Rotation in N-space
- Previous by thread: Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- Next by thread: Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|