Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: "Souvik" <souvik1982@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 07:04:59 +0000 (UTC)
Is state-vector reduction (or collapse of the wavefunction) a physical
process? Or is it really an artefact of our procedure of canonical
quantisation?
In the Feynman path integral approach to Quantum Theory, state-vector
reduction doesn't seem to be a process any more than asking the
question: What is the amplitude of going from a certain initial state
to a final state?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
- From: Seratend
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Seratend
- Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
- From: Seratend
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Seratend
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Seratend
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Seratend
- Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
- From: Seratend
- Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
- From: Seratend
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Seratend
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Frank Hellmann
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Frank Hellmann
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Baugh
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Aaron Bergman
- Re: Wave Function of the Universe?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
- Next by Date: Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
- Previous by thread: Black Holes and Antimatter...
- Next by thread: Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- Index(es):