Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- From: Arnold Neumaier <Arnold.Neumaier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 07:20:50 +0000 (UTC)
markwh04@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Wigner's classification of particles systems as irreducible
> representations of the Poincare' group doesn't apply to charged
> particles.
Why not? Electrons are charged particles and appear in the classification.
> The more general notion of particle classes in the presence
> of long-range forces is that of an "infraparticle".
These are no longer _irreducible_ representations.
Non-free QFT is a matter of suitable reducible representations,
and there are lots of them. Which ones to use is one of the
big questions.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- From: markwh04
- Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- References:
- Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- From: markwh04
- Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- Next by Date: Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?
- Previous by thread: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- Next by thread: Re: Why Aren't Infraparticles Already Wigner Particles?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|