Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Hendrik van Hees <hees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:44:54 +0000 (UTC)
Arnold Neumaier wrote:
> Almost everything they do in the nonrelativistic regime
> can be made rigorous in the rigged Hilbert space, so they fare right
> even when they imagine wrongly that they work in a Hilbert
> space. Thus they get away with their bad practices.
> What they call 'Hilbert space' _is_ in fact always a
> rigged Hilbert space; they just don't know and don't care.
Yeah, that's right. So in other words, I have to "smear" the usual Fock
states with wavepackets to get vectors in the Hilbert space. If one is
honest, one must do this all the time, I agree with you, especially
when deriving the LSZ-reduction formula and the like.
On the other hand, isn't this what the axiomatic quantum-field theorists
try to do, and they never could get a definite answer to the question
of a rigorous treatment of interacting relativististic QFTs? I don't
know much about the current status of this endeaver, but most
physicists, I know and work with, do not think very high of this quite
mathematical branch of QFT. One once said about it: "Ah, that's very
deep stuff, but they cannot explain more than the free particle. They
can not even prove QED to exist." Is this still true?
--
Hendrik van Hees Texas A&M University
Phone: +1 979/845-1411 Cyclotron Institute, MS-3366
Fax: +1 979/845-1899 College Station, TX 77843-3366
http://theory.gsi.de/~vanhees/ mailto:hees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- References:
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- Prev by Date: Stern-Gerlach Experiment2
- Next by Date: A Group-Orient book on Simple Lie Algebras
- Previous by thread: Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- Next by thread: Re: 10 questions on QM postulates
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|