Re: Penrose's nonsense



* Ralph Hartley:
>
> (1) Penrose's argument that quantum theory has important things to tell
> us about the mind is nonsense.
>
> (2) Making nonsense believable and respectable is *not* a good thing.
>
> (3) It would be a bad thing even *if* the conclusion were correct (which
> is very unlikely in this case). An invalid argument for a true
> proposition is still an invalid argument.

I agree with all three points, except the use of the word "unlikely", which
IMO is too categorical and unfounded.


> Nowadays there is debate about the practicality of building
> computational devices that exploit quantum effects. Maybe we can,
> maybe we can't. What is *quite* clear is that the human brain is
> *not* such a device. Nothing that is composed almost entirely of
> liquid water ever can be.

That argument doesn't seem to hold water.

The flaws in Penrose's arguments do not mean that quantum effects do
not have importance for the functioning of a biological brain. There is
much that is not well-understood even at the physics level. E.g., as I
recall (and this is from Penrose... :-)), how a noble gas such as Xenon --
a chemically non-reactive gas -- can work effectively as an analgesic.

In the face of that kind of unmapped territory I don't think one should
be too categorical in stating what could possibly be in that territory.

Or not.

In short, it seems to me that you're committing the same kind of error as
Penrose did: "X must be true or false because that's what I feel".

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Road with no Branches argument
    ... The idea that chaos in some way derives from quantum ... "My thesis is that the *real* quantum indeterminism ... >> quantum effects which are only manifested at the subatomic level are ... > a pencil balanced on its tip. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: April Fools Joke?
    ... CHICAGO - In the bizarre realm of quantum mechanics - the physics ... eerie quantum effects are growing so common that it's our understanding ... one photon of light at a time. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Penroses nonsense
    ... The physics of the brain is in scope, but the philosophy of the mind is ... Penrose's argument that quantum theory has important things to tell ... computational devices that exploit quantum effects. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Sentience
    ... As I said, there is much we don't know, and quantum decoherence could be ... > quantum effects to escape the microsopic level and enter the macroscopic ... the macroscopic effects of quantum mechanics. ... There mere existence of discrete pieces of matter is a ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)

Quantcast