Re: questions about UTC time, definitions, leap seconds, and measurement.



robert bristow-johnson <rbj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> i've been looking into the NIST site on their standard expression of the
> time:
>
> http://tf.nist.gov/pubs/bulletin/leapsecond.htm
>
> this brings me back several decades when i was a young ham radio operator
> and i tuned into WWV to set my clock and to calibrate my 100 kHz frequency
> calibrator.
>
> i think i understand sufficiently what astronomical time is and what atomic
> time is.
>
> my first question was this:
>
> by 1983, they must have expected about 1 leap second each mean year (1 part
> per 31556952) why didn't they define the second to be that much longer (say
> 9,192,632,060 cycles instead of 9,192,631,770 cycles of this cesium
> radiation? they would still have to add or subtract leap seconds
> occasionally, but much less often than they did in the late 20th century.
> why not, when you're *defining* the standard of time (with a much better
> standard), make that initial definition agree as much as possible with the
> known astronomical unit, and then stick to it?

They opted for best backwards compatibility with the second that was.
This had been defined in terms of the tropical year at 1900.

Anyway, it won't matter in the long run.
The earth is a clock that is steadily decelerating,
so the error will ultimately grow quadratically with time.
This will swamp any linear term due to a less fortunate choice
of the definition of the second.

> my second question is:
>
> what happened after 1999??? why are there no leap seconds after 1999 on
> that web page? certainly it must have been updated since then? were there
> *no* leap seconds added in the last 5 years?

Right, the earth has spun up a bit, temporarily one assumes.
So the shortish choice of the second may be fortunate after all.
Otherwise negative leap seconds might have been needed by now.

Best,

Jan

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: It it now a leap year?
    ... tell me if it is now a leap year, ... It's not part of the "standard" set of API calls, but GLib (a library ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: using mktime()
    ... >> mktime() is allowed to fail in other cases that the implementor ... That is, leap seconds actually happen ... > I believe the Standard specifies the representable range as 0-59. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • questions about UTC time, definitions, leap seconds, and measurement.
    ... i've been looking into the NIST site on their standard expression of the ... 9,192,632,060 cycles instead of 9,192,631,770 cycles of this cesium ... they would still have to add or subtract leap seconds ... when you're *defining* the standard of time (with a much better ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Fred Basset 11-14
    ... > The American delegation to the ITU is proposing dropping the leap ... > easily allow the addition of arbirary leap seconds. ... for a "leap hour" to be inserted when needed to get the time standard ... the standard allows for negative leap seconds in the event the ...
    (rec.arts.comics.strips)
  • Re: AC/voltage basic physics questions, please.
    ... is how electricity works, in my particular questions, at a low level; ... fit an earth leakage trip ... with green for ground but that changed to a different standard ... The 17th Edition of the Wiring Regulations is due to be published on 1st ...
    (sci.physics)