Re: A question of discrete space-time.
- From: Ben Rudiak-Gould <br276deleteme@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 05:20:07 +0000 (UTC)
Mike Helland wrote:
> __A1__A2__A3
> B1__B2__B3
> ______C1__C2__C3
>
> [...]
>
> __A1__A2__A3
> __B1__B2__B3
> __C1__C2__C3
>
> But if you were are row B, you would have seen row C move two spaces in
> a single instance (due to relative motion). This breaks the rules of
> the system.
I think the same argument would show that special relativity can't be
correct. It's not hard to arrange for a lattice theory of this kind to have
an approximate Lorentz symmetry at large scales.
-- Ben
.
- References:
- A question of discrete space-time.
- From: Ed Hanna
- Re: A question of discrete space-time.
- From: Mike Helland
- A question of discrete space-time.
- Prev by Date: Re: A Group-Orient book on Simple Lie Algebras
- Next by Date: Re: Stern-Gerlach Experiment2
- Previous by thread: Re: A question of discrete space-time.
- Next by thread: Re: A question of discrete space-time.
- Index(es):