sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Mpemba effect, I.Vecchi
• Re: length of wavetrain of single photon, HerbieTMac
• References to a pure path integral approach to QFT, theosekmechanes
  • Re: References to a pure path integral approach to QFT, Igor Khavkine
• Non-conventional Dimenion Analysis??, Gert-Jan
  • Re: Non-conventional Dimenion Analysis??, tessel
• re: Irreps and gauge fields, Haelfix
  • Re: Irreps and gauge fields, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Irreps and gauge fields, mikem
• Gravitational waves in strong field limit., LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
  • Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., carlip-nospam
    • Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., Souvik
• A question of discrete space-time, part 4, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 4, Igor Khavkine
• Heat Transfer coefficient for He gas, Mike
  • Re: Heat Transfer coefficient for He gas, Uncle Al
• Calculated crystal structure?, Uncle Al
• are holonomies arguably observables?, disposablemailaccountfornews
• Re: Site not found, Hans Aberg
  • Re: Site not found, zaw
• HELP: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii, Cl . Massé
• What am I seeing?, Ralph E. Frost
  • Re: What am I seeing?, Souvik
  • Re: What am I seeing?, J. J. Lodder
    • Re: What am I seeing?, Paul Danaher
      • Re: What am I seeing?, Ralph E. Frost
  • Re: What am I seeing?, John O'Flaherty
• Small, slow AC machines: surface to volume ratio?, DGoncz
  • Re: Small, slow AC machines: surface to volume ratio?, DGoncz
    • Re: Small, slow AC machines: surface to volume ratio?, DGoncz
• Re: crystal, Torsten Becker
  • Re: crystal, zaw
• Standard Model at Finite Temperatures, Souvik
  • Re: Standard Model at Finite Temperatures, markwh04
• Weinberg on the anomaly, Al . Rivero
  • Re: Weinberg on the anomaly, markwh04
    • Re: Weinberg on the anomaly, Al . Rivero
• categorified gauge theory, Urs Schreiber
• Re: GR question, tessel
• After getting FT and DF maps, zaw
  • Re: After getting FT and DF maps, Uncle Al
• QM oscillator - a question for experimental verification, Kevin Blake
  • Re: QM oscillator - a question for experimental verification, Uncle Al
  • Re: QM oscillator - a question for experimental verification, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: QM oscillator - a question for experimental verification, p . kinsler
• homogeneous spaces of semidirect product groups, florian . beissner
  • Re: homogeneous spaces of semidirect product groups, tessel
• Constraints in General Relativity, David Norton
  • Re: Constraints in General Relativity, carlip-nospam
• Mass and strong interaction., DW
  • Re: Mass and strong interaction., Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Mass and strong interaction., Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Mass and strong interaction., Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Mass and strong interaction., markwh04
    • Re: Mass and strong interaction., Al . Rivero
• Re: A Group-Orient book on Simple Lie Algebras, Arnold Neumaier
• FT and Least Square methods, zaw
  • Re: FT and Least Square methods, Zigoteau
• Fourier Transform in crystallography, zaw
  • Re: Fourier Transform in crystallography, Zigoteau
    • Re: Fourier Transform in crystallography, zaw
      • Re: Fourier Transform in crystallography, Zigoteau
      • Re: Fourier Transform in crystallography, zaw
    • Re: Fourier Transform in crystallography, zaw
• Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Seratend
  • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Seratend
      • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, I.Vecchi
      • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, bjflanagan
      • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Seratend
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Seratend
  • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Seratend
• A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Hontas F. Farmer III
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Hontas F. Farmer III
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, robert bristow-johnson
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, John C. Polasek
      • Re: Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Hontas F. Farmer III
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
• Re: meson scaling and total decay width, arivero
• New Physics Theory, Don
  • Re: New Physics Theory, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement", Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement", Alexey Popov
    • Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement", Jay R. Yablon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement", arivero
    • Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement", Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement", Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement", Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Black hole - star collision, tessel
  • Re: Black hole - star collision, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
• Looking for QFT Exercise Buddy, lost.and.lonely.physicist@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Back to 1917, island
  • Re: Back to 1917, island
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Back to 1917, island
• Re: Classical Action, Cl.Massé
• A theoretical physics FAQ, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: A theoretical physics FAQ, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: A theoretical physics FAQ, Arnold Neumaier
• Feynman's Conjecture, Ali
  • Re: Feynman's Conjecture, Igor Khavkine
• Feynman's Formulation Dirac inspiration, Ali
  • Re: Feynman's Formulation Dirac inspiration, Igor Khavkine
• Re: einstein tensor, moment of rotation and metric, disposablemailaccountfornews
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: einstein tensor, moment of rotation and metric, carlip-nospam
• Question on dominant energy condition in Hawking & Ellis, roy b
• gravitational stress-energy tensor, mihai cartoaje
  • Re: gravitational stress-energy tensor, Zigoteau
• Re: Seeking Relativity Experts for Doc Film, Perspicacious
• Applicability of Classical Concepts in Gravity-induced Quantum Interference, Ali
  • Re: Applicability of Classical Concepts in Gravity-induced Quantum Interference, Igor Khavkine
• currents or charges densities, cyberkatru
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: currents or charges densities, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: currents or charges densities, cyberkatru
  • Re: currents or charges densities, markwh04
• Canonical quantization and covariance, Thomas Larsson
  • Re: Canonical quantization and covariance, Ilja Schmelzer
    • Re: Canonical quantization and covariance, Thomas Larsson
  • Re: Canonical quantization and covariance, markwh04
    • Re: Canonical quantization and covariance, Robert Low
    • Re: Canonical quantization and covariance, Thomas Larsson
      • Re: Canonical quantization and covariance, Hendrik van Hees
• www.meteoquake.org new topic What is Meteoquake?, None
• RMS Charge Radius of a Neutron, RS
  • Re: RMS Charge Radius of a Neutron, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: RMS Charge Radius of a Neutron, FrediFizzx
      • Re: RMS Charge Radius of a Neutron, Arnold Neumaier
  • I'd love the see the same thing, Jay R. Yablon
• Hey Dirac! What about bosons?, timrobinson
  • Re: Hey Dirac! What about bosons?, Frank Hellmann
  • Re: Hey Dirac! What about bosons?, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: Hey Dirac! What about bosons?, Jack Tremarco
  • Re: Hey Dirac! What about bosons?, Igor Khavkine
• Inexpensive test for the Higgs field, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: Inexpensive test for the Higgs field, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Inexpensive test for the Higgs field, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: Inexpensive test for the Higgs field, disposablemailaccountfornews
    • Re: Inexpensive test for the Higgs field, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: Inexpensive test for the Higgs field, Uncle Al
    • Re: Inexpensive test for the Higgs field, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: Inexpensive test for the Higgs field, Squark
• Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, Richard Saam
  • Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, Spud
    • Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, Richard Saam
      • Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, Richard Saam
      • Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, Spud
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, I.Vecchi
      • Message not available
      • Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, Richard Saam
  • Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, Spud
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, John C. Polasek
• Re: Rotation in N-space, tessel
  • Re: Rotation in N-space, Neil
  • Re: Rotation in N-space, tessel
• A question about conservative diffusion., LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: A question about conservative diffusion., William R. Frensley
  • Message not available
    • Re: A question about conservative diffusion., LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: A question about conservative diffusion., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: A question about conservative diffusion., LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: A question about conservative diffusion., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: A question about conservative diffusion., acl
      • Re: A question about conservative diffusion., LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: A question about conservative diffusion., LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Stringiness and curvature, tessel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Stringiness and curvature, tessel
  • Re: Stringiness and curvature, tessel
• Time, Parameter, Operator, Ali
  • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Message not available
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Message not available
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Ralph E. Frost
    • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Marcel LeBel
    • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Uncle Al
    • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Marcel LeBel
  • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Seratend
    • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Seratend
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Seratend
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Seratend
• subtle background structure in deep astronomy photos; CSL-1 cosmic string gravitational lens in Capodimonte Deep Field; Millennium Simulation of evolving cosmic structure; AstroDeep group; Murray mesh; www.Flickr.com evolving cosmic structure; As, Rich Murray
  • Re: subtle background structure in deep astronomy photos; CSL-1 cosmic string gravitational lens in Capodimonte Deep Field; Millennium Simulation of evolving cosmic structure; AstroDeep group; Murray mesh; www.Flickr.com evolving cosmic structure; As, Neil
• Time's Arrow, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
  • Re: Time's Arrow, Maarten van Reeuwijk
  • Re: Time's Arrow, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Time's Arrow, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Time's Arrow, chronon
  • Re: Time's Arrow, Charles Francis
• Coherent States, Ali
  • Re: Coherent States, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Coherent States, Ralph E. Frost
  • Re: Coherent States, markwh04
• Experimental Data on [GaAs, GaP, InP and Si], Timtro
  • Re: Experimental Data on [GaAs, GaP, InP and Si], Uncle Al
• Urgent question about friction - pls help, Flint
  • Re: Urgent question about friction - pls help, Cl . Massé
  • Re: Urgent question about friction - pls help, J. J. Lodder
  • Re: Urgent question about friction - pls help, Ian Taylor
    • Re: Urgent question about friction - pls help, Flint
    • Re: Urgent question about friction - pls help, J. J. Lodder
  • Re: Urgent question about friction - pls help, quiasmox
• Hawking radiation and black hole formation, Gavin Polhemus
  • Re: Hawking radiation and black hole formation, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: Hawking radiation and black hole formation, Ilja Schmelzer
• Grassmann variables in Lattice Gauge Theory, timrobinson
  • Re: Grassmann variables in Lattice Gauge Theory, a student
  • Re: Grassmann variables in Lattice Gauge Theory, Thomas Larsson
• Relativistic Theory of the Non-Symmetric Field, Kurt Reichling
  • Re: Relativistic Theory of the Non-Symmetric Field, Zigoteau
• Question., Rozmonth
  • Re: Question., René Meyer
    • Re: Question., Rozmonth
• It's Actually a Biocentric Principle..., island
• The Elegant Universe, J. B. Wood
  • Re: The Elegant Universe, bjflanagan
  • Re: The Elegant Universe, Uncle Al
  • Re: The Elegant Universe, tessel
    • Re: The Elegant Universe, J. B. Wood
    • Re: The Elegant Universe, tessel
  • Re: The Elegant Universe, Joseph.D.Warner
  • Re: The Elegant Universe, FearlessFerret
• PDF, which one is this?, Daniel Alayon-Solarz
• Energy levels of Helium atoms, mike_in_england2000
  • Message not available
    • Re: Energy levels of Helium atoms, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Energy levels of Helium atoms, freezer
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Greg Egan
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Gerard Westendorp
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Gerard Westendorp
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), staym
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Gerard Westendorp
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), Gerard Westendorp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 215), staym
• How?, Rozmonth
  • Re: How?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: How?, Rozmonth
    • Re: How?, Igor Khavkine
• A question of discrete space-time, part 2, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 2, a student
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 2, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 2, Charles Francis
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 2, Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 2, Charles Francis
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 2, Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 2, Charles Francis
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 2, Ed Hanna
• Re: Here is Definitive Proof that Leptons have spin 1!, markwh04
  • Re: Here is Definitive Proof that Leptons have spin 1!, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Here is Definitive Proof that Leptons have spin 1!, Golden Boar
  • Re: Here is Definitive Proof that Leptons have spin 1!, Golden Boar
    • Re: Here is Definitive Proof that Leptons have spin 1!, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: Here is Definitive Proof that Leptons have spin 1!, Golden Boar
• Random fields., Rozmonth
  • Re: Random fields., Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Random fields., Eugene Stefanovich
• ??? Quaternions ???, weg22
  • Re: ??? Quaternions ???, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: ??? Quaternions ???, Zigoteau
• Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Uncle Al
    • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Spud
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Spud
  • Message not available
    • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Spud
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Harry
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Harry
  • Message not available
    • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Uncle Al
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, RM Mentock
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Uncle Al
    • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Spud
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Spud
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Uncle Al
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
    • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Harry
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, russell
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Harry
      • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, Harry
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
  • Re: Honest Question Re Traveling Triplets, kk
• Re: Statistical Physics, markwh04
• Re: Macro-Quantum Geometrodynamics, himog
  • Re: Macro-Quantum Geometrodynamics, FrediFizzx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Macro-Quantum Geometrodynamics, Stephen Paul King
• Origin of the word Dilaton, René Meyer
  • Re: Origin of the word Dilaton, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Origin of the word Dilaton, bjflanagan
  • Re: Origin of the word Dilaton, markwh04
• complex vector?, David Macmanus
  • Re: complex vector?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: complex vector?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: complex vector?, René Meyer
  • Re: complex vector?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: complex vector?, bjflanagan
• Can one derive full GR from its specific predictions?, stargene
  • Re: Can one derive full GR from its specific predictions?, Roman Werpachowski
  • Re: Can one derive full GR from its specific predictions?, stargene
  • Re: Can one derive full GR from its specific predictions?, carlip-nospam
  • Re: Can one derive full GR from its specific predictions?, tessel
• FTL Communication ?, Spud
  • Re: FTL Communication ?, Spud
    • Re: FTL Communication ?, Nick Maclaren
• Ontological Domains (was Re: Induction and Quantum Mechanics), Mike Helland
  • Re: Ontological Domains (was Re: Induction and Quantum Mechanics), Marcel LeBel
• Re: Penrose's nonsense, Ralph Hartley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Charles Francis
    • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Charles Francis
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Charles Francis
    • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Penrose's nonsense, Charles Francis
• Re : Quantization Procedures, markwh04
  • Re: Re : Quantization Procedures, Arnold Neumaier
• Yang-Mills Fields, sylvain . golenia
  • Re: Yang-Mills Fields, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Yang-Mills Fields, sylvain . golenia
      • Re: Yang-Mills Fields, Igor Khavkine
• Expectation Value, Ali
  • Re: Expectation Value, mahdiarnt
• Degeneracy, Ali
• Re: A question of discrete space-time., Mike Helland
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Alan
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Igor Khavkine
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Mike Helland
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Igor Khavkine
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Charles Francis
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Mike Helland
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Igor Khavkine
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Charles Francis
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Mike Helland
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time., Igor Khavkine
      • QED's incompatibility with SR (was Re: A question of discrete space-time.), Mike Helland
      • Re: QED's incompatibility with SR (was Re: A question of discrete space-time.), Igor Khavkine
      • QED incompatibility with SR, Eugene Stefanovich
• Cyber forum of Dielectric Phenomena or of Dielectric and Electrical Material?, Ringo
• Hilbert spaces and quantum mechanics, David Macmanus
  • Re: Hilbert spaces and quantum mechanics, Hans Aberg
  • Re: Hilbert spaces and quantum mechanics, vonnyn
    • Re: Hilbert spaces and quantum mechanics, Eckard Blumschein
  • Re: Hilbert spaces and quantum mechanics, Arnold Neumaier
• Re: 10 questions on QM postulates, Arnold Neumaier
• Re: upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength, J. J. Lodder
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: upper/lower *theoretical* limits for photon wavelength, Charles Francis
• ftl SETI, Rick Wilson
  • Re: ftl SETI, Uncle Al
  • Re: ftl SETI, robert bristow-johnson
• Collisional Excitation and Striations in Glow Discharges, thomas . smid
• Simultaneous Eigenkets of Incompatible Obsevables, Ali
  • Re: Simultaneous Eigenkets of Incompatible Obsevables, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Simultaneous Eigenkets of Incompatible Obsevables, John T Lowry
  • Re: Simultaneous Eigenkets of Incompatible Obsevables, Igor Khavkine
• Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Hontas F. Farmer III
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Uncle Al
      • Re: Why Should We Quantize Geometry?, Hontas F. Farmer III
• Matrix Representation, Ali
  • Re: Matrix Representation, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Matrix Representation, John T Lowry
• Re: Induction and Quantum Mechanics, Marcel LeBel
• Commutation Relation, Ali
  • Re: Commutation Relation, John T Lowry
  • Re: Commutation Relation, Igor Khavkine
• Foundational Physics, Ali
• particle wave conception of wave function, Ali
  • Re: particle wave conception of wave function, John T Lowry
• Re: On the wave function of the photon, Cl . Massé
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
  • Re: On the wave function of the photon, Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, rof
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Charles Francis
    • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, rof
      • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Charles Francis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, rof
    • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, bjflanagan
    • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Ralph Hartley
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, bjflanagan
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, scerir
    • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, scerir
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, bjflanagan
  • Re: Why physicists should pay attention to the mind, disposablemailaccountfornews
• Re: Books to read for intuition rather than precision., John Baez
• Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
    • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
    • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Aaron Bergman
    • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Aaron Bergman
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Aaron Bergman
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Aaron Bergman
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Aaron Bergman
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
    • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Hans Aberg
    • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Aaron Bergman
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Hans Aberg
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Aaron Bergman
      • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps., Hans Aberg
• Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Arnold Neumaier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Seratend
    • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Seratend
    • Re: Wave Function of the Universe?, Arnold Neumaier
• Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Particle number in interacting theories, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Particle number in interacting theories, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?, Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, rof
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, rof
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Hendrik van Hees
      • Observing single quantum systems, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Joe Rongen
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, joe
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, I.Vecchi
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, I.Vecchi
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, I.Vecchi
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Joe Rongen
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Seratend
    • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, I.Vecchi
    • Message not available
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, Arnold Neumaier
    • Message not available
      • Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?, rof

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint