Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: "I.Vecchi" <vecchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 22:21:50 +0000 (UTC)
Aaron Bergman wrote:
> In article <1117448074.219697.96620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Seratend" <ser_monmail@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> > Now how can you deduce (from QM theory) the preferred basis and what we
> > "really" measure in this experiment?
>
> You need to describe to me the macroscopic degrees of freedom in your
> experiment, ie, the macrostates by which you are performing your
> observation.
Isn't this obviously circular? Aren't the "the macrostates by which you
are performing your observation" precisely what decoherence is supposed
to derive from a purely quantum description the process?
IV
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Aaron Bergman
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- Next by Date: Re: How real are the "Virtual" partticles?
- Next by thread: Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- Index(es):