Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Aaron Bergman <abergman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 05:38:55 +0000 (UTC)
In article <429CC172.3010801@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Eugene Stefanovich <eugenev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2. Quantum mechanics does not explain the origin of these probabilities.
> All QM can do is to calculate these probabilities.
> In textbook QM, the formula |<a|psi>|^2 is a postulate, but this
> formula can be derived from a more fundamental "quantum logic" approach.
> (see chapter 4 in physics/0504062)
> If you know the rules of quantum mechanics, you can describe the
> state of your system by a vector |psi> in the Hilbert space,
> and the measurement by another vector |a>, and calculate/predict
> the probability of finding value a in the state |psi> by using above
> formula.
Outside of this 'envariance' stuff that I don't really understand, I
know of no way to derive the probability rules from QM -- in particular,
the use of the reduced density matrix really already assumes the Born
rule. Even envariance assumes, a priori, that these probabilities exist
which seems to be avoiding the central question to me.
Aaron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- References:
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- From: Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- Prev by Date: Re: On the wave function of the photon
- Next by Date: Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- Next by thread: Re: Is State Vector Reduction a 'Process'?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading