Re: Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3

John C. Polasek wrote:
> My theory posits a discrete space time if you want to look at it that
> way. Everything originated in electron positron pairs in cells of
> specific dimension 3.541e-14m. See paper #1 on my website.
> John Polasek
> http://www.dualspace.net

Having read you paper in total I observe the following.

In your paragraph on black holes you state

"Dual Space computes Vesc similarly, but due to the Navier Stokes weakening
effect, c merely declines to zero at a black hole. (also the cell size
expands without limit)"

Consider the following question. What happens to a photon which is
mass-less when it's velocity goes to zero? To consider this one does not
need to use any relativity. Consider the de Broglie Wavelength
formula. /lambda = h/p where h is Planck's constant and p is momentum.
When the velocity goes to zero the photon has no momentum therefore it's de
Broglie wavelength (which is the same as the wavelength that determines
it's color there is no difference there) goes to infinity. That will be
true even if you suppose a nonzero mass for a photon. How then could it
fit in side the black hole? The "cell size" increasing without bound is
also very bad because then how could a cell fit in a black hole? Anything
increasing with out bound is bad in physics. Divergences are a bad sign for
a post-modern theory.

I also see that the theory has one glaring fatal flaw. It seems that when
you encounter a problem which the original principles of dual space cannot
handle you introduce another principle. A well constructed theory will
flow naturally from one or two principles and axioms. That is the appeal
of the General theory of Relativity. The fact that your theories
predictions can be explained in a more simple manner which does not have
the problems that Dual Space does means that your theory has been
superseded. Superseded before it was even written down.

Don't take this personally.
--
Let me get this straight we "advanced" from telgraphs to email?-GeorgeCarlin
http://www.geocities.com/hontasfx

.

Relevant Pages

  • RE: Sort affects formula
    ... "John C" wrote: ... modify each cell in column D to match it's "opposite" ... exercises to a set) so when sorted on column B the exercises would be sorted ... Column 'C' might be the maximum weight used in each exercise. ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.newusers)
  • RE: Dropdown box display only data dependent on another dropdown b
    ... "John C" wrote: ... Click on the cell that has the drop down box for your state list. ... and then type in myState. ... I had to define two other variables, State List and County List ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions)
  • Re: Wildcard character in an "If" statement?
    ... Looking for John: ... My goal is to look in a cell which contains a phrase. ... Johnson ", or "Danny Thomas " ... I want to locate a single word within a string of 5 or six words. ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions)
  • RE: Cant Drag a cell on a password protected sheet (Excel 2003)
    ... Edit objects, Thank you John. ... I think when you PW protect the sheet, you probably just use the default ... I know that I can still drag and drop with a drop down validation ... The cell is unlocked. ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.misc)
  • Re: Returning multiple indices for a lookup
    ... Looking back at your post - since you have a counter set up, ... John 1234 ... James 3456 ... As a solution I am thinking to get the cell reference instead of the content, get the rows of the reference using SMALL and then use that index to get the content. ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions)