sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Light reading for high brows, bjflanagan
• Nested commutators as derivatives? Is a Lie group closed? And relations to parallel transport?, lost.and.lonely.physicist@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Nested commutators as derivatives? Is a Lie group closed? And, Eugene Stefanovich
• Simulations: Good intro. books, Dean Rickles
• The time it takes to emit one photon, Paul Danaher
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Oz
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, DM Roberts
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Marcel LeBel
• fermion doubling problem in deconstruction models, very_cryptic
• Effect of outward negative energy flux from accreting black hole?, stargene
• Electrostatic Cooling, Roger Rusch
• Re: Schumann resonance and FTL, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Schumann resonance and FTL, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
• Conformal Group and General Relativity, Jack Sarfatti
• String Theory Vs Quantum Gravity : Politics, Suresh Maran
  • Re: String Theory Vs Quantum Gravity : Politics, markwh04
• Question about black hole temperatures, Ian Taylor
• Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND,, Charles Francis
• EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), we_pretty
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Uncle Al
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), we_pretty
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Uncle Al
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Kit Adams
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Jeremy Henty
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), disposablemailaccountfornews
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), ebunn
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), ebunn
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Brucebo
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Kit Adams
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Kit Adams
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), we_pretty
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Uncle Al
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Oz
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), ebunn
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), we_pretty
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), markwh04
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Oz
• Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Charles Francis
  • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Charles Francis
    • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Charles Francis
  • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Charles Francis
  • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Charles Francis
  • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Oz
  • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Charles Francis
  • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Charles Francis
• Hawkings new paper, Jim O'Reilly
  • Re: Hawkings new paper, Spud
  • Re: Hawkings new paper, Hontas F. Farmer III
• Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, spinnet
  • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, thomas_larsson_01
    • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, Suresh Maran
  • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, bjflanagan
  • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, thomas_larsson_01
    • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, Suresh Maran
    • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, jcgonsowski
      • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, Suresh Maran
  • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, jcgonsowski
• Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Nick Maclaren
    • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Nick Maclaren
    • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, scerir
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
• Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics?, t_pellman
  • Re: Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics?, Martin Ouwehand
  • Re: Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics?, Matthew Nobes
  • Re: Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics?, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics?, Georg M. von Hippel
  • Re: Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics?, Ian Taylor
  • Re: Why isn't the constant force problem covered in Quantum Mechanics?, J. J. Lodder
• QUIVER GAUGE THEORIES, georgie
  • Re: QUIVER GAUGE THEORIES, Aaron Bergman
    • Re: QUIVER GAUGE THEORIES, Kris Kennaway
• Maxwell's Demon, vonnyn
  • Re: Maxwell's Demon, erite423
    • Re: Maxwell's Demon, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Maxwell's Demon, erite423
      • Re: Maxwell's Demon, Tony
  • Re: Maxwell's Demon, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Maxwell's Demon, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Maxwell's Demon, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Maxwell's Demon, erite423
• Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, erite423
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, bjflanagan
    • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, bjflanagan
    • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, George E. Hammond
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, Uncle Al
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, mark_horn
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, bjflanagan
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, bjflanagan
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, bjflanagan
• 2 Postdoctoral and 2 PhD positions in microfabricated Lab-on-a-Chip, Anders Wolff
• pion and supersymmetry, Al . Rivero
• nuclear binding energy for deuteron, FrediFizzx
  • Re: nuclear binding energy for deuteron, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: nuclear binding energy for deuteron, johndevers
• Gleason's theorem and N=2, vonnyn
  • Re: Gleason's theorem and N=2, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Gleason's theorem and N=2, vonnyn
      • Re: Gleason's theorem and N=2, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Gleason's theorem and N=2, a student
    • Re: Gleason's theorem and N=2, vonnyn
      • Re: Gleason's theorem and N=2, a student
  • Re: Gleason's theorem and N=2, Seratend
    • Re: Gleason's theorem and N=2, a student
      • Re: Gleason's theorem and N=2, Seratend
      • Re: Gleason's theorem and N=2, a student
• PRL The First Hundred Years, Alexander
  • Re: PRL The First Hundred Years, FrediFizzx
    • Re: PRL The First Hundred Years, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: PRL The First Hundred Years, FrediFizzx
      • Re: PRL The First Hundred Years, FrediFizzx
• Standard model gauge group from clifford algebras, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: Standard model gauge group from clifford algebras, jcgonsowski
  • Re: Standard model gauge group from clifford algebras, markwh04
    • Re: Standard model gauge group from clifford algebras, gar
    • Re: Standard model gauge group from clifford algebras, Al . Rivero
• do photons distort spacetime?, curious
  • Re: do photons distort spacetime?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: do photons distort spacetime?, Alexey Popov
      • Re: do photons distort spacetime?, Frank Hellmann
      • Re: do photons distort spacetime?, lost.and.lonely.physicist@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: do photons distort spacetime?, J. J. Lodder
• Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, gsax
  • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, Javier Bezos
      • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, scerir
  • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, Oz
    • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, Raymond Manzoni
  • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, Cl . Massé
    • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Einstein's thoughts on particle nature of light, Bossavit
• ADMINISTRIVIA: expect delays, Igor Khavkine
• Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, Chris Pollett
  • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, Lou Pecora
    • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, I.Vecchi
      • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
      • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, Chris Pollett
    • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, Lou Pecora
    • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?,
  • Re: Pseudorandom number generators in nature?, John O'Flaherty
• Pauli Spin Matrices in Domain Walls, trpublicaddress
  • Re: Pauli Spin Matrices in Domain Walls, J. J. Lodder
  • Re: Pauli Spin Matrices in Domain Walls, Gerard Westendorp
• wolfram's a new kind of science, redpicture
  • Re: wolfram's a new kind of science, Uncle Al
    • Re: wolfram's a new kind of science, redpicture
  • Re: wolfram's a new kind of science, Lou Pecora
  • Re: wolfram's a new kind of science, Alf P. Steinbach
    • Re: wolfram's a new kind of science, Kit Adams
      • Re: wolfram's a new kind of science, Kit Adams
• leptons, pions and QCD SSB, Al . Rivero
• Neuton and Electron diffractions, zaw
  • Re: Neuton and Electron diffractions, Uncle Al
    • Re: Neuton and Electron diffractions, zaw
  • Re: Neuton and Electron diffractions, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Neuton and Electron diffractions, Oz
• General Hamilton-Poisson Mechanics, EF Ferrari
  • Re: General Hamilton-Poisson Mechanics, James Baugh
    • Re: General Hamilton-Poisson Mechanics, EF Ferrari
  • Re: General Hamilton-Poisson Mechanics, EF Ferrari
• N=2 Sigma model (repost), Jorge Pessoa
• A question of discrete space-time, part 5, Ed Hanna
• Question about the epsilon in using dim reg to derive the beta function of QFTs, lost.and.lonely.physicist@xxxxxxxxx
• Atomic General Relativity, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Atomic General Relativity, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Atomic General Relativity, Souvik
      • Re: Atomic General Relativity, disposablemailaccountfornews
      • Re: Atomic General Relativity, Souvik
      • Re: Atomic General Relativity, Marc Nardmann
  • Re: Atomic General Relativity, markwh04
    • Re: Atomic General Relativity, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Atomic General Relativity, disposablemailaccountfornews
  • Re: Atomic General Relativity, disposablemailaccountfornews
    • Re: Atomic General Relativity, Marc Nardmann
      • Re: Atomic General Relativity, disposablemailaccountfornews
  • Re: Atomic General Relativity, disposablemailaccountfornews
• Macro-Quantum Emergent Gravity, Jack Sarfatti
• Re: Canonical quantization and covariance, markwh04
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Canonical quantization and covariance, markwh04
• Re: Irreps and gauge fields, markwh04
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Irreps and gauge fields, Oz
• N=2 Sigma model, Jorge Pessoa
• Thematic Program on Geometric Applications of Homotopy Theory, John Baez
• Gibbs free energy, jdvrxxx@xxxxxxxxx
• Uncertainty Relations, ariana
  • Re: Uncertainty Relations, a student
• Complex Conformal Group, Pauca Sed Matura
• Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Seratend
  • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, J. Horta
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Marcel LeBel
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Oz
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Marcel LeBel
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Eugene Stefanovich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, markwh04
  • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, abstract
  • Re: Time, Parameter, Operator, Oz
• Objective criteria for something being a "force", Alf P. Steinbach
• Re: currents or charges densities, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: currents or charges densities, cyberkatru
    • Re: currents or charges densities, Igor Khavkine
• Higher gauge theory, John Baez
• Why doesn't statistical mechanics apply for the quantum field responsible for inflation?, lost.and.lonely.physicist@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 4, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 4, Ed Hanna
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 4, Gerard Westendorp
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 4, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 4, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 4, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 4, Igor Khavkine
• Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Seratend
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, I.Vecchi
      • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics, scerir
      • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics, I.Vecchi
      • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, bjflanagan
      • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Postulates for quantum mechanics (was; Is State Vector Reduction, I.Vecchi
• Re: Heat Transfer coefficient for He gas,
  • Re: Heat Transfer coefficient for He gas, Mike
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Heat Transfer coefficient for He gas, Mike
  • Re: Heat Transfer coefficient for He gas, Charles DH Williams
    • Re: Heat Transfer coefficient for He gas, Mike
  • Re: Heat Transfer coefficient for He gas, Gerard Westendorp
• Re: are holonomies arguably observables?, Igor Khavkine
• Hydrogen n=1 spin transition, rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Hydrogen n=1 spin transition, Uncle Al
  • Re: Hydrogen n=1 spin transition, rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Hydrogen n=1 spin transition, Uncle Al
• Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, Spud
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pioneer 10 & 11 deceleration implications?, I.Vecchi
• Re: What am I seeing?, John O'Flaherty
  • Re: Poorman's cloud chamber analogy Was: What am I seeing?, Ralph E. Frost
    • Re: Poorman's cloud chamber analogy Was: What am I seeing?, John O'Flaherty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What am I seeing?, Paul Danaher
  • Re: What am I seeing?, Jon Bell
• No new Einstein, John Baez
  • Re: No new Einstein, Uncle Al
    • Re: No new Einstein, I.Vecchi
    • Re: No new Einstein, =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
  • Re: No new Einstein, David Park
    • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
    • Re: No new Einstein, Tim Josling
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: No new Einstein, =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
    • Message not available
      • Re: No new Einstein, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: No new Einstein, René Meyer
    • No new Riemann, tessel
  • Re: No new Einstein, Frank Hellmann
  • General Frame Covariance in Achronal Quantum General Relativity (was: No new Einstein), markwh04
  • Re: No new Einstein, galathaea
  • Re: No new Einstein, backdoorstudent
  • Re: No new Einstein, markwh04
  • Re: No new Einstein, tuppence
  • Re: No new Einstein, porterboy76
  • Re: No new Einstein, LEJ Brouwer
    • Re: No new Einstein, markwh04
      • Re: No new Einstein, Ed Hanna
      • Re: No new Einstein, cmaj10
  • Re: No new Einstein, Uncle Al
    • Re: No new Einstein, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: No new Einstein, Uncle Al
      • Re: No new Einstein, markwh04
    • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
    • Re: No new Einstein, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: No new Einstein, acl
    • Re: No new Einstein, LEJ Brouwer
      • Re: No new Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: No new Einstein, acl
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: No new Einstein, Marcel LeBel
      • Re: No new Einstein, Charles Francis
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: No new Einstein, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: No new Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
    • Re: No new Einstein, Cl . Massé
      • Re: No new Einstein, acl
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: No new Einstein, Mike Helland
  • Re: No new Einstein, acl
    • Re: No new Einstein, cmaj10
  • Re: No new Einstein, cmaj10
    • Re: No new Einstein, Uncle Al
      • Re: No new Einstein, Paul Danaher
    • Re: No new Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: No new Einstein, acl
  • Re: No new Einstein, acl
    • Re: No new Einstein, Cl . Massé
  • Re: No new Einstein, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: No new Einstein, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: No new Einstein, acl
    • Re: No new Einstein, cmaj10
  • Re: No new Einstein, Torbjorn Larsson
  • Re: No new Einstein, LEJ Brouwer
    • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: No new Einstein, Torbjorn Larsson
  • Re: No new Einstein, cmaj10
• Pioneer anomaly, John Baez
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Spud
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Richard Saam
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Spud
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Richard Saam
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, John Baez
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, kk
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Torbjorn Larsson
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Spud
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Charles Francis
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, I.Vecchi
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Charles Francis
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Spud
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Spud
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Charles Francis
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, I.Vecchi
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Spud
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Spud
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, garth
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Richard Saam
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Charles Francis
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, garth
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Richard Saam
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, garth
• dielectric interpretation, rancid moth
• Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Souvik
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ralph Hartley
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ed Hanna
  • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Souvik
    • Re: A question of discrete space-time, part 3, Ralph Hartley
• Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., carlip-nospam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., carlip-nospam
  • Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., Souvik
  • Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., LEJ Brouwer
    • Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., carlip-nospam
  • Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Mpemba effect, Spud
  • Re: Mpemba effect, I.Vecchi
    • Re: Mpemba effect, I.Vecchi
• Re: References to a pure path integral approach to QFT, theosekmechanes
  • Re: References to a pure path integral approach to QFT, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: References to a pure path integral approach to QFT, theosekmechanes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: References to a pure path integral approach to QFT, Frank Hellmann
    • Re: References to a pure path integral approach to QFT, acl
• PRobem of deconvolution..., tramoman
  • Re: PRobem of deconvolution..., John Reed

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint