Re: wolfram's a new kind of science



thank you for the opinions. he covers a lot of ground, and to be fair
doesn't really have a new kind of science -- rather a framework,
analogy, or perspective. it's a lot to reallly judge as a whole because
there is soooooo dang much of it.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: No new Einstein
    ... opinions about which is correct are ... religion, not science. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Q!Re: Shall We All Leave At Once?
    ... >>> appeals to Plato and Aristotle spring to mind). ... >> Your so called citations are nothing more than personal opinions of>> other ... >> Yove not studied real science or philosophy. ... > Mathematics doesn't predict anything. ...
    (rec.arts.drwho)
  • Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
    ... Then try studying the facts of history. ... You look at others opinions of how science works. ... Working daily with scientists that are doing science was necessary. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper"
    ... >>provided what looks like a memetic lightning rod, ... > you do not support. ... Your statements above are of course your own opinions and ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Science = Votes? (Re: real theories vs imaginary tales ...)
    ... I never said that science equals votes. ... other's opinions into your line of reasoning. ... such as Zach and RAM and Name Mangler. ...
    (talk.origins)