Re: No new Einstein
- From: Cl.Massé <toto@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 06:13:02 +0000 (UTC)
"acl" <achilleaslazarides@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
1121118187.439761.308700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Is it really fundamentally flawed to say that if something is attempted
> 100 times and it fails, then it can't be done? It's exactly the logic
> that is used in science (namely, inductive, rather than deductive).
This logic is used for building a theory, which have then to be verified by
experiment. But it often happens that the theory is falsified by an
experimental result. It is the fate of all theory.
Now, saying that only a probalistic theory can describe Nature at the
quantum level, because every other attempt failed, is by itself a
fully-fledged theory, awaiting to be falsified.
--
~~~~ clmasse on free F-country
Liberty, Equality, Profitability.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No new Einstein
- From: acl
- Re: No new Einstein
- References:
- No new Einstein
- From: John Baez
- Re: No new Einstein
- From: acl
- No new Einstein
- Prev by Date: Re: No new Einstein
- Next by Date: Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity
- Previous by thread: Re: No new Einstein
- Next by thread: Re: No new Einstein
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|