Re: No new Einstein

Just to make something clear, at no point did I claim that a
probabilistic description is necessary, correct, or incorrect. Neither
did I claim the opposite: nobody knows, and all we can do is come up
with educated guesses which we then compare to experiment.

All I was saying was that if such a thing happened in everyday life,
you'd conclude that it can't be done. Obviously, it doesn't (and can't)
constitute a proof that it can't be done.

Of course, the fact that we don't really know allows everybody to have
his or her own opinion.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: stall question
    ... Isn't this both incorrect and the opposite of what you said earlier? ... Jim Strathmeyer ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.sport.disc)
  • Re: Another Bad Experience at PC World
    ... All generalisations are incorrect to some degree, ... enough to care about. ... Shame that nobody agrees with you from the Govt to CCCS, ...
    (uk.comp.vendors)
  • Re: Paramount
    ... Nobody is telling you that ... you should wear a helmet if you don't want to; ... Quite the opposite, sonny boy, quite the opposite. ... It ain't the helmet-free proponents who are clinging to nothing but myth and legend. ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)
  • Re: NEEC logo
    ... version for National eXpress East Coast, why do posters here insist on ... using the incorrect "NEEC"? ... of using initial letters. ... Nobody at National Express has informed me ...
    (uk.railway)
  • Re: Pay for your rescue.
    ... recreational users became better educated of their opposite number's ... and while nobody was looking, the chough returned to Cornwall. ...
    (uk.rec.walking)