Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity
- From: jcgonsowski@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:11:20 +0000 (UTC)
thomas_larsson_01@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> jcgonsow...@xxxxxxxxx skrev:
> >
> > But is the harmonic oscillator well understood?
>
> Yes.
Well if the use of harmonic oscillators for field theory is so well
understood, where are all the nice particle mass and force strength
calculations like lattices have? Seems like harmonic oscillators
require reproducing lattice results more than lattices require
reproducing harmonic oscillator results.
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/cnfGrHg.html#Qgr
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/USGRFckb.html
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/Sets2Quarks9.html
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer
- Next by Date: fermion doubling problem in deconstruction models
- Previous by thread: Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity
- Next by thread: Hawkings new paper
- Index(es):