sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Time, RHNL
  • Re: Time, Uncle Al
• Re: Inexpensive test for the Higgs field, Richard Saam
• Branes - Please help, isol
  • Re: Branes - Please help, Xi Yin
• Branes, isol
  • Re: Branes, René Meyer
• Two presenters of a "scientific" France 2 (public TV channel) programme,, YBM
• Is 'time' time or is it not., RHNL
  • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., stefanbanev
      • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., Nick Maclaren
  • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., René Meyer
  • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., J. Horta
  • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., I.Vecchi
  • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., Ralph E. Frost
  • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., Marcel LeBel
  • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., Marcel LeBel
    • Re: Is 'time' time or is it not., Christopher Fortin
• Re: Quartic Grassmann terms, SG
• Nonlocality of Gravity Energy, Jack Sarfatti
• Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), cmaj10
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), juanrgonzaleza
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Javier Bezos
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Homo Lykos
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Paul Stowe
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Homo Lykos
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Cl.Massé
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), juanrgonzaleza
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Harry
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Cl.Massé
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Harry
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), juanrgonzaleza
• New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics, Jay R. Yablon
• Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, David Park
  • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Tobin Fricke
    • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, ebunn
      • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Souvik
      • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Gerry Quinn
  • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, nightlight
      • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, David Park
  • Re: Pedagogy of QM Double Slit Experiment, Oz
• Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), I.Vecchi
  • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), rof
    • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), Ivica Kolar
      • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), rof
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), I.Vecchi
  • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), Charles Francis
    • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), rof
      • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), Marcel LeBel
    • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), Charles Francis
    • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), I.Vecchi
  • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), Charles Francis
• background field method (via Peskin)?, mahdiarnt
• That Scoundrel of Relativity, Hermann Minkowski, Eugene Shubert
  • Re: That Scoundrel of Relativity, Hermann Minkowski, schoenfeld1
  • Re: That Scoundrel of Relativity, Hermann Minkowski, Perspicacious
• Experiment, Andrés
  • Re: Experiment, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Experiment, Joe Rongen
• SUPER COSMOS, Jack Sarfatti
• hopefully not FAQ, monika mueller
  • Re: hopefully not FAQ, John O'Flaherty
• electron wave equation, mihai cartoaje
  • Re: electron wave equation, Igor Khavkine
• Does 'time' exhibit wave properties?, RHNL
  • Re: Does 'time' exhibit wave properties?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Does 'time' exhibit wave properties?, RHNL
  • Re: Does 'time' exhibit wave properties?, Bryan F.E.
• General Relativity, Zack
  • Re: General Relativity, David Park
    • Re: General Relativity, tessel
      • Re: General Relativity, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: General Relativity, Robert Low
  • Re: General Relativity, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: General Relativity, Spinnet
  • Re: General Relativity, René Meyer
    • Re: General Relativity, the softrat
  • Re: General Relativity, tessel
  • Re: General Relativity, tessel
  • Re: General Relativity, tessel
    • Re: General Relativity, David Park
      • Re: General Relativity, tessel
      • Re: General Relativity textbooks, Bryan F.E.
      • Re: General Relativity, Oz
      • Re: General Relativity, tessel
  • Re: General Relativity, Charles Francis
  • Re: General Relativity, Bill Kavanagh
  • Re: General Relativity, tessel
• Quaternions, weg22
  • Re: Quaternions, Zigoteau
• Termostatics by Gross, kazimierz.kurz@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Termostatics by Gross, kazimierz.kurz@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Function of Mirrors, RHNL
  • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, the softrat
  • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, RHNL
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, RHNL
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, RHNL
  • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Charles Francis
    • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Gerry Quinn
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Gerry Quinn
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Charles Francis
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Gerry Quinn
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, the softrat
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Gerry Quinn
      • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Oz
  • Re: Quantum Function of Mirrors, Souvik
• How come no one exhibits the stress-energy of a rock at rest?, the softrat
  • Re: How come no one exhibits the stress-energy of a rock at rest?, Robert Low
    • Re: How come no one exhibits the stress-energy of a rock at rest?, the softrat
      • Re: How come no one exhibits the stress-energy of a rock at rest?, Robert Low
      • Re: How come no one exhibits the stress-energy of a rock at rest?, the softrat
• Thermal Inductance, s.morra
  • Re: Thermal Inductance, Gerard Westendorp
    • Re: Thermal Inductance, s.morra
      • Re: Thermal Inductance, Gerard Westendorp
      • Re: Thermal Inductance, p . kinsler
      • Re: Thermal Inductance, brian a m stuckless
  • Re: Thermal Inductance, Kiviranta, Mikko
• A Nuclear Landscape, georgie
  • Re: A Nuclear Landscape, David M. Palmer
  • Re: A Nuclear Landscape, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: A Nuclear Landscape, Cl.Massé
• Naturalness of the fine-tuning hierarchy, ptamirez
• Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, berry
    • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect, berry
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant., berry
  • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, markwh04
    • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Ken S. Tucker
    • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Maxwell's theory is not Poincare invariant. was: Mossbauer effect, Ken S. Tucker
• What is wrong with string theory?, Spinnet
  • Re: What is wrong with string theory?, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: What is wrong with string theory?, Souvik
    • Re: What is wrong with string theory?, Charles Francis
  • Re: What is wrong with string theory?, Mike Helland
  • Re: What is wrong with string theory?, Spinnet
  • Re: What is wrong with string theory?, Spinnet
    • Re: What is wrong with string theory?, Gerry Quinn
  • Message not available
    • Re: What is wrong with string theory?, Gerry Quinn
  • Re: What is wrong with string theory?, markwh04
• Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), I.Vecchi
  • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), rof
    • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), I.Vecchi
      • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), rof
• meet the A^b Forward/backward anomaly, Al . Rivero
• Is algebraic holography cheating?, very_cryptic
  • Re: Is algebraic holography cheating?, very_cryptic
• Stress Energy Paradox, T . M . Tlas
  • Re: Stress Energy Paradox, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Stress Energy Paradox, T . M . Tlas
• It's a Self-Similar World, rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, markwh04
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Perspicacious
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, cmaj10
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, juanrgonzaleza
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Murray Arnow
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Homo Lykos
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Homo Lykos
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl . Massé
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Homo Lykos
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Homo Lykos
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl . Massé
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl . Massé
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, cmaj10
  • What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), juanrgonzaleza
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Javier Bezos
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), cmaj10
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Cl.Massé
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Harry
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), cmaj10
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Javier Bezos
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Homo Lykos
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Cl.Massé
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Harry
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), juanrgonzaleza
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), cmaj10
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Javier Bezos
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Perspicacious
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Cl.Massé
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Javier Bezos
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Homo Lykos
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Javier Bezos
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), cmaj10
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), cmaj10
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Harry
      • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Cl . Massé
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Joe Rongen
• New discovery: Negative Information Content., innominatetwice
  • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., a student
  • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., a student
    • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., scerir
      • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., a student
      • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., a student
      • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., scerir
    • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., C. M. Heard
      • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., a student
      • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., C. M. Heard
      • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., a student
  • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., Cl.Massé
  • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., innominatetwice
    • Re: New discovery: Negative Information Content., robert bristow-johnson
• Where can I find a catalogue of (d,p) cross sections?, jbd_28
  • Re: Where can I find a catalogue of (d,p) cross sections?, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Where can I find a catalogue of (d,p) cross sections?, Jan N. Klug
  • Re: Where can I find a catalogue of (d,p) cross sections?, Robert Komar
• Einstein's Repudiation of the Continuum (was: No new Einstein), markwh04
  • Re: Einstein's Repudiation of the Continuum (was: No new Einstein), rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Einstein's Repudiation of the Continuum (was: No new Einstein), Charles Francis
• What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, the softrat
  • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, Spud
    • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, the softrat
  • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
  • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, markwh04
    • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, markwh04
    • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, we_pretty
  • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, mikem
    • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, the softrat
  • Re: What is the 'Unruh Effect'?, tessel
• Gravitation lab naughtiness, Uncle Al
  • Re: Gravitation lab naughtiness, Douglas Natelson
  • Re: Gravitation lab naughtiness, Richard Miller
• Uncertainty in studying of string theory, ariana
• SU(3) and recursivity of quarks?, Al . Rivero
• Did Dalton found Nanotechnology?, Spinnet
• When does QM become QSM?, vonnyn
  • Re: When does QM become QSM?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: When does QM become QSM?, vonnyn
      • Re: When does QM become QSM?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: When does QM become QSM?, disposablemailaccountfornews
    • Re: When does QM become QSM?, Ralph Hartley
    • Re: When does QM become QSM?, Igor Khavkine
• Quick question about the action of a system, armin
  • Re: Quick question about the action of a system, Igor Khavkine
• Is light deflected by electric field?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, tessel
    • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Murat
      • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, mikem
      • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Gerry Quinn
      • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, tessel
      • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Oz
      • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, the softrat
      • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, tessel
  • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Murat
  • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Murat
    • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, tessel
  • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Thomas Smid
    • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Thomas Smid
      • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Thomas Smid
  • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Murat
  • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, Oz
    • Re: Is light deflected by electric field?, tessel
• Yablon Doff and Nattale, Al . Rivero
  • Re: Yablon Doff and Nattale, Jay R. Yablon
    • Re: Yablon Doff and Nattale, Al . Rivero
    • Boson masses vs. vev? (was: Yablon Doff and Nattale), markwh04
  • Re: Boson masses vs. vev? (was: Yablon Doff and Nattale), Al . Rivero
  • Re: Boson masses vs. vev? (was: Yablon Doff and Nattale), Hans de Vries
  • Re: Boson masses vs. vev? (was: Yablon Doff and Nattale), Al . Rivero
• Einstein Hole Argument, Jack Sarfatti
• ADMINISTRIVIA: expect delays, Igor Khavkine
• Directional Correlation of Atomic Cascade Emissions, Thomas Smid
• Circadian Rhythm Anaphase to Diurnal, DGoncz
  • Re: Circadian Rhythm Anaphase to Diurnal, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Circadian Rhythm Anaphase to Diurnal, robert bristow-johnson
• The Twin Paradox in a Closed Universe, Souvik
  • Re: The Twin Paradox in a Closed Universe, Perspicacious
    • Re: The Twin Paradox in a Closed Universe, a student
  • Re: The Twin Paradox in a Closed Universe, Uncle Al
    • Re: The Twin Paradox in a Closed Universe, Souvik
  • Re: The Twin Paradox in a Closed Universe, Bossavit
• Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, YBM
  • Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, robert bristow-johnson
    • Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, YBM
  • Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, I.Vecchi
    • Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
    • Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, YBM
  • Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
    • Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia, Jim Heckman
• Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Perspicacious
  • Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, cmaj10
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, harald . vanlintel
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, cmaj10
      • Re: Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Perspicacious
      • Re: Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincar=E9?= acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincar=E9?= acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged asthe true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Martin Ouwehand
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, harald . vanlintel
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Martin Ouwehand
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincar=E9?= acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincar=E9?= acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Martin Ouwehand
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, harald . vanlintel
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincar=E9?= acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Martin Ouwehand
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincar=E9?= acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Charles Francis
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincar=E9?= acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Paul Stowe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Harry
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, cmaj10
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Paul Stowe
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, harald . vanlintel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Paul Stowe
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Paul Stowe
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Harry
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, EF Ferrari
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Harry
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Michelson-Morley vs. astronomical data [was "Why Poincare ..."], Paul Stowe
      • Re: Michelson-Morley vs. astronomical data [was "Why Poincare ..."], Nick Maclaren
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, I.Vecchi
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincar=E9?= acknowledged asthe true discoverer of special relativity?, Phil
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincar=E9?= acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Charles Francis
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged asthe true discoverer of special relativity?, Tim
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Javier Bezos
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincar=E9?= acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Javier Bezos
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincaré acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
  • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, cmaj10
  • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, cmaj10
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri =?unknown?q?Poincaré?= acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Javier Bezos
  • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, Javier Bezos
  • Message not available
    • Re: Michelson-Morley vs. astronomical data [was "Why Poincare ..."], cmaj10
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Javier Bezos
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
  • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, EF Ferrari
    • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, harald . vanlintel
  • Re: Why isn't Poincare the true discoverer of SR, cmaj10
• Operators acting on one part of an entangled system, diogenes500
  • Re: Operators acting on one part of an entangled system, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Operators acting on one part of an entangled system, diogenes500
      • Re: Operators acting on one part of an entangled system, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Operators acting on one part of an entangled system, diogenes500
      • Re: Operators acting on one part of an entangled system, Igor Khavkine
• does a microscope magnify speed?, armin
  • Re: does a microscope magnify speed?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: does a microscope magnify speed?, acl
  • Re: does a microscope magnify speed?, =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
    • Re: does a microscope magnify speed?, a student
• Is the Gauge Fixing Condition Exact?, lost.and.lonely.physicist@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is the Gauge Fixing Condition Exact?, Igor Khavkine
• Re: Liquid drop model., =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
  • Re: Liquid drop model., jrfsousa
• integral on a spherical surface, armin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: integral on a spherical surface, Greg Egan
• Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., Kwok Man Hui
  • Re: Gravitational waves in strong field limit., carlip-nospam
• Re: Problem of deconvolution..., Arnold Neumaier
• Re: pion and supersymmetry, Al . Rivero
• Quick question about DeBroglie wavelength and UCM, armin
  • Re: Quick question about DeBroglie wavelength and UCM, Igor Khavkine
• Re: General Hamilton-Poisson Mechanics, EF Ferrari
• Why are strings not invoked as a solution to nonlocality?, John McCrone
  • Re: Why are strings not invoked as a solution to nonlocality?, bjflanagan
  • Re: Why are strings not invoked as a solution to nonlocality?, jarek korbicz
  • Re: Why are strings not invoked as a solution to nonlocality?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Light reading for high brows, georgie
• Re: PRobem of deconvolution..., tramoman
  • Re: Problem of deconvolution..., robert bristow-johnson
    • Re: Problem of deconvolution..., tramoman
      • Re: Problem of deconvolution..., robert bristow-johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PRobem of deconvolution..., tramoman
• Re: Schumann resonance and FTL, Kit Adams
  • Re: Schumann resonance and FTL, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Schumann resonance and FTL, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Schumann resonance and FTL, Kit Adams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Schumann resonance and FTL, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Schumann resonance and FTL, Kit Adams
  • Re: Schumann resonance and FTL, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
• Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Charles Francis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Charles Francis
    • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Oz
      • Re: Missing Mass, Galaxy Ageing, Supernova Redshift, MOND, Pioneer, Charles Francis
• Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, Igor Khavkine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, bjflanagan
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, bjflanagan
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, bjflanagan
      • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, rof
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, schoenfeld1
    • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, I.Vecchi
    • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: Latest psychophysics/QM brain article, I.Vecchi
• confusion about Faddeev-Popov quantization, LuRan
• Re: Pioneer anomaly, Richard Saam
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, garth
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Richard Saam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, I.Vecchi
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Charles Francis
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, jcgonsowski
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, I.Vecchi
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Charles Francis
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, jcgonsowski
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Oz
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, jcgonsowski
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Charles Francis
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Spud
      • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Charles Francis
• Re: do photons distort spacetime?, Alexey Popov
• Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Seratend
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Robert Low
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Robert Low
    • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, bz
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Oz
      • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Oz
    • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Nick Maclaren
    • Re: Mossbauer effect and retarded interactions, Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: No new Einstein, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: No new Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: No new Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: No new Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: No new Einstein, cmaj10
      • Re: No new Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: No new Einstein, cmaj10
      • Re: No new Einstein, I.Vecchi
      • Re: No new Einstein, cmaj10
      • Re: No new Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: No new Einstein, I.Vecchi
      • Re: No new Einstein, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: No new Einstein, Marcel LeBel
      • Re: No new Einstein, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: No new Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: No new Einstein, I.Vecchi
      • Re: No new Einstein, cmaj10
      • Re: No new Einstein, I.Vecchi
      • Re: No new Einstein, cmaj10
      • Re: No new Einstein, =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
      • Re: No new Einstein, I.Vecchi
      • Re: No new Einstein, scerir
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: No new Einstein, I.Vecchi
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: No new Einstein, I.Vecchi
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: No new Einstein, rof
      • Re: No new Einstein, I.Vecchi
      • Re: No new Einstein, rof
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: No new Einstein, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: No new Einstein, Cl.Massé
    • Re: No new Einstein, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: No new Einstein, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: No new Einstein, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: No new Einstein, =?unknown?q?Cl=2EMass=E9?=
      • Re: No new Einstein, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: No new Einstein, Torbjorn Larsson
  • Re: No new Einstein, I.Vecchi
    • Re: No new Einstein, rof
• Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, Thomas Larsson
  • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, jcgonsowski
  • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, Suresh Maran
    • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, thomas_larsson_01
      • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, Spinnet
  • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, Suresh Maran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, jcgonsowski
    • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, Spinnet
      • Re: Critique of Lubos Motl's opinions on Loop Quantum Gravity, jcgonsowski
• Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Oz
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), ebunn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), markwh04
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Joe Rongen
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Uncle Al
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), we_pretty
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), disposablemailaccountfornews
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), we_pretty
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Ralph Hartley
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Oz
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), markwh04
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Uncle Al
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), we_pretty
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), we_pretty
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Ilja Schmelzer
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), we_pretty
    • Re: EP and Unruh - effect (Layman), Uncle Al
• Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Kit Adams
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Oz
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, John F
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, p . kinsler
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, David Park
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, p . kinsler
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Oz
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Oz
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Oz
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Pierre Asselin
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Oz
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Oz
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Oz
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, RP
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Paul Danaher
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Paul Danaher
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Paul Danaher
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Paul Danaher
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Paul Danaher
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Paul Danaher
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Paul Danaher
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, backdoorstudent
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, p . kinsler
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, p . kinsler
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Souvik
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint