Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein)
- From: rof@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:21:13 +0000 (UTC)
"I.Vecchi" <vecchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>rof@xxxxxxxxxxxx ha scritto:
>> ... what new insight
>> into quantum mechanics was provided by Rovelli emphasising
>> relationalism once more?
>RQM provides an adequate conceptual setting to tackle the issue of
>superposed observers, which I now regard as crucial. In the setting of
>RQM ascertaining the intersubjective nature of what is commonly called
>"reality" becomes a concrete experimental challenge.
Can you elaborate on that a little? What's the issue that needs tackling?
And, since relational quantum mechanics is an interpretation, it gives
the same predictions as regular quantum mechanics, or rather, makes
no predictions apart from those already made by regular quantum mechanics.
Are you saying that it gives us a better way to interpret the results
of experiments with superposed observers?
R.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein)
- From: Ivica Kolar
- Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein)
- References:
- Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein)
- From: I.Vecchi
- Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein)
- Prev by Date: Re: What is wrong with string theory?
- Next by Date: Re: General Relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein)
- Next by thread: Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|