Re: Does 'time' exhibit wave properties?

Periodicity? A constant? Which one?
RHNL

"Bryan F.E." <bfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1125276839.954977.63280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Can we safely agree that while the assertion that the Earth has some
> kind of geologic periodicity of 586 million years is wrong, implying
> the need for new physics based on a perceived coincidence between that
> period and a supposed 590 million light-year displacement between some
> unidentified pair of superclusters qualifies for Pauli's epithet of
> "not even wrong"?
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova...
    ... -:) Then there's the Snowball Earth theory - ET ain't phoning home to ... cloud that were proposed as working hypotheses, ... terrestrial mass extinctions seen in the geologic record: ... confounded by the collection of more data on the supposed periodicity ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Does time exhibit wave properties?
    ... Can we safely agree that while the assertion that the Earth has some ... kind of geologic periodicity of 586 million years is wrong, implying ...
    (sci.physics.research)