sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Query on the action for general relativity, David Norton
• Four simple queries re a one-way light speed case, kk
• sonar effects in whale strandings?, tony fleming
  • Re: sonar effects in whale strandings?, Spud
• discrete gauge transformation?, LuRan
• A hole on the roof... [optics], Externet
  • Re: A hole on the roof... [optics], Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: A hole on the roof... [optics], Cl . Massé
• illusory spatial dimension, t7c1
  • Re: illusory spatial dimension, Uncle Al
  • Re: illusory spatial dimension, Spud
• Re: Anyone ever read this Einstein physics book?, tessel
  • Re: Anyone ever read this Einstein physics book?, Lou Pecora
    • Re: Anyone ever read this Einstein physics book?, tessel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Anyone ever read this Einstein physics book?, Javier Bezos
• Hamilton Vs Newton, vonnyn
  • Re: Hamilton Vs Newton, Robert Low
• Cluster growth, José Rui Faustino de Sousa
  • Re: Cluster growth, Uncle Al
• Eikonals, DGoncz
  • Re: Eikonals, Cl . Massé
  • Re: Eikonals, DGoncz
• Big Bang singularity, thesparr0w1
  • Re: Big Bang singularity, tessel
• Re: Classical vs quantum grassmann variables, John Baez
• Electron's zitterbewegung, Tony
  • Re: Electron's zitterbewegung, johndevers
    • Re: Electron's zitterbewegung, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Electron's zitterbewegung, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
    • Re: Electron's zitterbewegung, DRLunsford
      • Re: Electron's zitterbewegung, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Electron's zitterbewegung, Kit Adams
      • Re: Electron's zitterbewegung, Souvik
      • Re: Electron's zitterbewegung, Kit Adams
• Can spacetime collapse a wavefunction?, Ben
• Re: dark energy ammendment !, Danny Ross Lunsford
• Conjecture on Baez's 'Quasar without a host galaxy', stargene
  • Re: Conjecture on Baez's 'Quasar without a host galaxy', robert bristow-johnson
    • Re: Conjecture on Baez's 'Quasar without a host galaxy', stargene
  • Re: Conjecture on Baez's 'Quasar without a host galaxy', john_ramsden
    • Re: Conjecture on Baez's 'Quasar without a host galaxy', stargene
• Fubini-Study metric, revisited, Zig
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222), John Baez
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222), Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222), Ralph Hartley
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222), Paul Danaher
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222), Robert C. Helling
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222), Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222), Arnold Neumaier
• state variables, biplabbose
  • Re: state variables, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: state variables, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: state variables, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: state variables, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: state variables, Munir
      • Re: state variables, Ralph Hartley
  • Re: state variables, Collet Olivier - PERMANENT
• Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, DRLunsford
    • Re: Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, DRLunsford
      • Re: Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors, Jay R. Yablon
• Posted another Preview Paper, Jay R. Yablon
• Posting Web Site Previews of Upcoming Papars, Jay R. Yablon
• Pair Density in Supergiant Stars., Rev. Thomas Winans
• naturalness, hierarchy, fine-tuning, ptamirez
  • Re: naturalness, hierarchy, fine-tuning, René Meyer
• Re: Electrons; switching between waves and particles., FrediFizzx
• Re: Dark Energy, Michael C Price
  • Re: Dark Energy, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Dark Energy, Michael C Price
      • Re: Dark Energy, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: Dark Energy, Michael C Price
      • Re: Dark Energy, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Michael C Price
      • Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Michael C Price
      • Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, ebunn
• Quasi-matter, David
  • Re: Quasi-matter, Uncle Al
  • Re: Quasi-matter, Souvik
• Re: Some Interesting Mathematical and Physical concepts, Kwok Man Hui
• Re: How can light travel without losing energy?, Einar Andreas Rødland
• the plane of space, Helios
  • Re: the plane of space, Igor
  • Re: the plane of space, Souvik
    • Re: the plane of space, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
• Quantum states from classical states?, himog
  • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, Igor
  • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, vonnyn
  • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, markwh04
    • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, p . kinsler
  • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, jarek korbicz
    • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, C. M. Heard
      • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, jarek korbicz
      • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, p . kinsler
  • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, Souvik
  • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, himog
    • Re: Quantum states from classical states?, Souvik
• Marginal Operators, Constantin Rasinariu
• Is the ZPE background independent, Mike
  • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, Mike
      • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, p . kinsler
      • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, Aaron Denney
      • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, Mike
  • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, Souvik
    • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, Souvik
    • Re: Is the ZPE background independent, p . kinsler
• On the classical reality of particle physics, Eric Flesch
  • Re: On the classical reality of particle physics, PD
  • Re: On the classical reality of particle physics, Harry
    • Re: On the classical reality of particle physics, Marcel LeBel
• Dark matter may not exist, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Dark matter may not exist, Juan R.
  • Re: Dark matter may not exist, DRLunsford
  • Re: Dark matter may not exist, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Dark matter may not exist, DRLunsford
  • Re: Dark matter may not exist, thomas_larsson_01
    • Re: Dark matter may not exist, thomas_larsson_01
• What actually is "mass"?, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: What actually is "mass"?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: What actually is "mass"?, Hans Aberg
  • Re: What actually is "mass"?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: What actually is "mass"?, LEJ Brouwer
  • Re: What actually is "mass"?, MEGA
  • Re: What actually is "mass"?, frisbieinstein
  • what is mass?, Nic
    • Re: what is mass?, Uncle Al
      • Re: what is mass?, Stephen Paul King
    • Re: what is mass?, Paul Stowe
  • Re: What actually is "mass"?, markwh04
    • Re: What actually is "mass"?, Marcel LeBel
  • Re: What actually is "mass"?, rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What actually is "mass"?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: What actually is "mass"?, LEJ Brouwer
• Latest Theories about the Universe, nekoogar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• What the current status of Kopeikin's claims on speed of gravity?, dan
  • Re: What the current status of Kopeikin's claims on speed of gravity?, tessel
  • Re: What the current status of Kopeikin's claims on speed of gravity?, melroysoares
  • Re: What the current status of Kopeikin's claims on speed of gravity?, dan
  • Re: What the current status of Kopeikin's claims on speed of gravity?, carlip-nospam
  • Re: What the current status of Kopeikin's claims on speed of gravity?, tessel
• String Theory., aseem
• a (hopefully) simple quaternion question, weg22
  • Re: a (hopefully) simple quaternion question, uchchwhash
• Entanglement through, IWonder
  • Re: Entanglement through, Douglas Eagleson
• Quaternions to Euler, weg22
• Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, s1r . h3nry
  • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, nightlight
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, nightlight
  • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, vanesch
  • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, nightlight
    • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, Caroline Thompson
  • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, nightlight
  • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, nightlight
    • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, Caroline Thompson
      • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, p . kinsler
  • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, vanesch
  • Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment, nightlight
• Re: 15-j sybmols, Hsuan-Yeh Chang
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 15-j sybmols, Igor Khavkine
• Cracked glass, lost.and.lonely.physicist@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Cracked glass, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Cracked glass, George Hammond
  • Re: Cracked glass, uchchwhash
  • Re: Cracked glass, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: Cracked glass, Greysky
• Re: How active is research on other quantum gravity theories than loops or strings, Hontas F. Farmer III
  • Re: How active is research on other quantum gravity theories than loops or strings, I.Vecchi
    • Re: How active is research on other quantum gravity theories than loops or strings, Tim Josling
      • Re: How active is research on other quantum gravity theories than loops or strings, I.Vecchi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How active is research on other quantum gravity theories than loops or strings, John Baez
  • Re: How active is research on other quantum gravity theories than loops or strings, thomas_larsson_01
• Question about derivative of the metric tensor, co.georg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Group theory question, Igor
  • Re: Group theory question, Gerard Westendorp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Group theory question, Igor
    • Re: Group theory question, Gerard Westendorp
• metastability, Tobias Fritz
  • Re: metastability, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: metastability, Torbjorn Larsson
• Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Harry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Javier Bezos
    • Re: What is the history of relativity theory? (continuation of Poincare thread), Harry
• Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl.Massé
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl.Massé
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl . Massé
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Juan R.
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Harry
  • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, Javier Bezos
    • Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?, harry
• string susceptibility, John Baez
  • Re: string susceptibility, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: string susceptibility, Robert C. Helling
• Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), I.Vecchi
  • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), rof
    • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), Eugene Stefanovich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), I.Vecchi
    • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), rof
    • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), scerir
  • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), I.Vecchi
    • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), rof
  • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), I.Vecchi
  • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), I.Vecchi
    • Re: Superposed observers (was No new Einstein), rof
• Conway's 'Angel Problem' and Critical Phenomena?, nramavar
  • Re: Conway's 'Angel Problem' and Critical Phenomena?, nramavar
• Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Daryl McCullough
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Thomas Smid
    • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Thomas Smid
  • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Thomas Smid
    • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Juan R.
  • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, markwh04
    • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Thomas Smid
      • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Juan R.
  • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Thomas Smid
    • Re: Derivation of Lorentz Transformation, Dirk Van de moortel
• Striking Regularities In The World Population Curve, markwh04
  • Re: Striking Regularities In The World Population Curve, Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: Striking Regularities In The World Population Curve, markwh04
• Re: Angular Characteristics of Photoelectron Emission, p . kinsler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Angular Characteristics of Photoelectron Emission, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Angular Characteristics of Photoelectron Emission, johndevers
  • Re: Angular Characteristics of Photoelectron Emission, Igor Khavkine
• Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?, Homo Lykos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?, Ilja Schmelzer
    • Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?, tessel
      • Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?, markwh04
  • Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?, Juan R.
  • Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?, Juan R.
• Re: Pioneer anomaly, Esa A E Peuha
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, bz
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Gerard Westendorp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Gerard Westendorp
    • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly, Gerard Westendorp
• Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Juan R.
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, J. Horta
    • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, J. Horta
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Juan R.
      • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Charles Francis
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, carlip-nospam
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Juan R.
    • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Juan R.
    • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, J. Horta
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Juan R.
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Charles Francis
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Charles Francis
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Juan R.
    • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Juan R.
    • Re: Why do we need quantum fields in QED?, Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: where does newtons laws fail, Harry
• Re: The Black Hole in a Spatially Compact Spacetime, tessel
• Re: Most accurate measurements of particle position?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Most accurate measurements of particle position?, Nick Maclaren
    • Re: Most accurate measurements of particle position?, Tony
      • Re: Most accurate measurements of particle position?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Most accurate measurements of particle position?, Tony
• Re: Gauge Transformations in Momentum Space?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Gauge Transformations in Momentum Space?, mikem
    • Re: Gauge Transformations in Momentum Space?, Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Gauge Transformations in Momentum Space?, mikem
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gauge Transformations in Momentum Space?, mikem
• Re: Forces in GTR, tessel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Forces in GTR, Marcel LeBel
• Re: Q: Recent review article on Einstein-Cartan theory, physics and mathematics thereof, Joseph Voros
• Re: Schwarzschild vs Isotropic Coordinates, carlip-nospam
  • Re: Schwarzschild vs Isotropic Coordinates, Murat Ozer
    • Re: Schwarzschild vs Isotropic Coordinates, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Schwarzschild vs Isotropic Coordinates, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
      • Re: Schwarzschild vs Isotropic Coordinates, Murat Ozer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Schwarzschild vs Isotropic Coordinates, Ken S. Tucker
• Some insights on Bogdanov's "work", YBM
  • Re: Some insights on Bogdanov's "work", YBM
• Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Homo Lykos
  • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Harry
    • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Homo Lykos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Harry
  • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Harry
    • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Homo Lykos
      • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, harry
      • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Homo Lykos
      • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Harry
  • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Frank Hellmann
    • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Harry
  • Re: Why Einstein is the founder of special relativity, Juan R.
• Books on ODE/PDE for self study., jonabsoul
  • Re: Books on ODE/PDE for self study., Hans Aberg
  • Re: Books on ODE/PDE for self study., Mark Fisher
• Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Eugene Stefanovich
    • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, Tony
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight
  • Re: The time it takes to emit one photon, nightlight

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint