Re: Quasi-matter
- From: "Souvik" <souvik1982@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 22:09:07 +0000 (UTC)
David wrote:
> I just finished watching a bio of Einstein on PBS as a rather novice
> on his work. Seems to me that matter is the condensation of energy,
> and that velocity is the catalyst that transforms matter into energy.
> ( Much as heat transforms ice into steam. )
>
> It also seems implied, because no mention was made to the state of
> matter after the speed of light was broken ( they discussed before the
> speed of light and when the speed of light was squared ): that matter
> otherwise left un-altered, must be solid ( or remain in the same state )
> until it reaches the speed of light, and that beyond the speed of light
> squared, matter was turned into energy. So it seems to me that there
> must be some sort of quasi-matter state. Much like water, between steam
> and ice, and that this quasi-matter state should exist between the
> speed of light and the speed of light squared ( the speed of light
> squared being where matter turns into energy ).
>
> It also seems that matter, if accelerated between the speed of light
> and the speed of light squared ( and in order to remain in the same
> space, preferably harmonic ) that matter would enter into a kind of
> energy-matter combination ( is this called plasma??? ), and this very
> much reminds me of Star Trek "transporter" technology. Moreover, if one
> were to exceed exciting matter beyong the speed of light squared, one
> would have what is very much known as a "phaser."
>
> I'm anxious to know how feasible, mathematically, this is.
> RSVP to misterrgb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Signed,
>
> Light enthusiast.
Your impression from the PBS programme is almost entirely wrong.
.
- References:
- Quasi-matter
- From: David
- Quasi-matter
- Prev by Date: Re: photoelectric effect : hypothetical experiment
- Next by Date: Re: Is the ZPE background independent
- Previous by thread: Re: Quasi-matter
- Next by thread: Re: Dark Energy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
