Re: Quantum states from classical states?
- From: "jarek korbicz" <phixphi@xxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:56:28 +0000 (UTC)
> And every quantum state can be written as a superposition of coherent
> states, though not in a unique way. Thus the view of quantums states as
> superposition of classical (i.e., coherent) states is fully valid.
The distinction between classical and quantum states can be very nicely
formalized when one looks at the general, i.e. mixed states of a
canonically quantized system. Then one finds that indeed there are
states which behave like classical (the only ad hoc assumption being
that one uses normally ordered operators when calculating averages). If
anybody wants to learn more about how to distinct those states, he may
want to take a look at Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 153601 (2005)
> Of course, under a sufficiemtly nontrivial quantum dynamics,
> a coherent state does not remain coherent as time develops;
> this explains the departure from classicality in quantum mechanics.
To be more precise, only hamiltonians at most quadratic in x, p leave
coherent states invariant.
Best,
jarek
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quantum states from classical states?
- From: C. M. Heard
- Re: Quantum states from classical states?
- References:
- Quantum states from classical states?
- From: himog
- Quantum states from classical states?
- Prev by Date: Re: What actually is "mass"?
- Next by Date: Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?
- Previous by thread: Re: Quantum states from classical states?
- Next by thread: Re: Quantum states from classical states?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|