Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222)
- From: Paul Danaher <paul.danaher@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:41:53 +0000 (UTC)
Ralph Hartley wrote:
> John Baez wrote:
...
>> My main worry about their work is that it uses a fixed slicing of
>> spactime by timelike slices. So, there's a danger that their
>> procedure breaks Lorentz-invariance, even in the continuum limit
>> which they are attempting to compute. I would like to find a way
>> around this problem!
>
> This is only a problem if the slices have any physical effects,
> hopefully they don't.
Am I hearing resonances here of "piecewise integrability"? Is there
something physically magical about the boundaries?
.
- References:
- This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222)
- From: John Baez
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222)
- From: Ralph Hartley
- This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222)
- Prev by Date: Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222)
- Next by Date: Re: Why isn't the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativity?
- Previous by thread: Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222)
- Next by thread: Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 222)
- Index(es):