Re: state variables
- From: Ralph Hartley <hartley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:24:16 +0000 (UTC)
Arnold Neumaier wrote:
My description above was for proteins in solution, considered as a fluid. Only on this level is local equilibrium appropriate. But on this level, one cannot use the model of an isotropic fluid, which leads to Newtonian behavior. Macromolecules are strongly non-Newtonian.
If you are thinking about physiological conditions, things are worse still. Many proteins do not function in solution, but are embedded in membranes with different conditions on each side (e.g. ion pumps), or bound in complexes with hundreds of proteins and other molecules (e.g. ribosomes, chromosomes), or both.
Also, the thermodynamic approximation may not be very good. Some molecules must exist in exact numbers (chromosomes again, one extra or one missing is bad news), and a *single* molecule of some proteins (e.g. ricin) will kill a cell.
Ralph Hartley
.
- References:
- state variables
- From: biplabbose
- Re: state variables
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: state variables
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: state variables
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: state variables
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- state variables
- Prev by Date: Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy
- Next by Date: Re: Classical vs quantum grassmann variables
- Previous by thread: Re: state variables
- Next by thread: Re: state variables
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|